Quantum Mechanics problem: Determine the value of the constant

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a quantum mechanics problem involving the canonical quantization relation and the connection between the commutator and the identity. The poster seeks guidance on proving a specific equation related to energy eigenstates and the Hamiltonian. A hint is provided, suggesting that the commutator [H, X] is crucial to understanding the problem. The poster ultimately finds success in solving the problem after grappling with the calculations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of respectful assistance in academic discussions.
Ineedhelpimbadatphys
Messages
9
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
The problem states work for word.

Using canonical quantization relation, prove that
sum operator ((E_n -E_0)) |< E_n | X | E_0 >|^2) = constant

Where E_0 is the energy corresponding to the eigenstate | E_0 >. Determine the value of the constant. Assume the hamiltonian had a general form H = P/2m +V(X)

Hint: One way to proof this is to think how [H, X], X] is connected to the obove identity.
Relevant Equations
all equations i have are in the statement.
I have no idea where to start with this problem. I am interested in any hints, or ways to proof this. But i would especially like to know how the commutator is connected to the identity.
 

Attachments

  • 385A8420-90F2-4204-8439-15C0224B4160.jpeg
    385A8420-90F2-4204-8439-15C0224B4160.jpeg
    25.8 KB · Views: 133
Physics news on Phys.org
Please, everyone, be respectful of poster asking for a hint about one specific aspect of this problem.
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark, Lord Jestocost and berkeman
Ineedhelpimbadatphys said:
Homework Statement:: The problem states work for word.

Using canonical quantization relation, prove that
sum operator ((E_n -E_0)) |< E_n | X | E_0 >|^2) = constant

Where E_0 is the energy corresponding to the eigenstate | E_0 >. Determine the value of the constant. Assume the hamiltonian had a general form H = P/2m +V(X)

Hint: One way to proof this is to think how [H, X], X] is connected to the obove identity.
Relevant Equations:: all equations i have are in the statement.

I have no idea where to start with this problem. I am interested in any hints, or ways to proof this. But i would especially like to know how the commutator is connected to the identity.
What is ##< E_0 \mid [H,X],X]] \mid E_0 >##?

-Dan
 
Thank you so much. I did actually manage to figure it out. I had tried calculatibg that, and got stuck at < E_0 | XHX | E_n > and assumed I was wrong.

After seeing this, I just kept trying and got it. thank you.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and topsquark
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top