Quantum Scattering Differential Probability

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on quantum scattering differential probability as presented in Griffiths' "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics." It clarifies that while Griffiths claims the probability of an incident particle passing through an area \(d\sigma\) equals the probability of scattering into a solid angle \(d\Omega\), this is only valid for azimuthally symmetric targets. The relationship \(\frac{d \sigma}{d \Omega} = |f(\theta)|^2\) holds true under these conditions, as the scattering cross-section does not depend on the direction of the scattered particle. The discussion emphasizes that this equivalence does not apply universally, particularly when the scattering process is direction-dependent.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly scattering theory.
  • Familiarity with wavefunctions and their representations in quantum mechanics.
  • Knowledge of azimuthally symmetric scattering scenarios.
  • Basic grasp of probability theory as it applies to quantum systems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Griffiths' "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" focusing on the scattering chapter.
  • Research azimuthally symmetric scattering processes in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the implications of scattering cross-sections and their dependence on particle direction.
  • Learn about the mathematical derivation of the relationship \(\frac{d \sigma}{d \Omega} = |f(\theta)|^2\).
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those focusing on scattering theory, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to quantum scattering processes.

CDL
Messages
20
Reaction score
1
I am reading Griffiths' Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, specifically the chapter on scattering. He is discussing the scenario where an incoming beam of particles scatter off an azimuthally symmetric target.

At large separation ##r## from the scattering centre, the wavefunction for incoming particles is $$\psi(r, \theta) \approx A \left[e^{ikz} + f(\theta) \frac{e^{ikr}}{r}\right] = \psi_\text{incident} + \psi_\text{scattered}$$ He says,

"The probability that the incident particle, traveling at speed v, passes through the infinitesimal area ##d \sigma##, in time ##dt## is equal to the probability that the particle scatters into the corresponding solid angle ##d \Omega##."

He equates ##dP =|\psi_{\text{incident}}|^2 dV = |A|^2 (v dt) d\sigma## to ##dP = |\psi_{\text{scattered}}|^2 dV = \frac{|A|^2 |f|^2}{r^2} (vdt) r^2 d \Omega##

This is used to derive the relation ##\frac{d \sigma}{ d \Omega} = | f (\theta) | ^2##.

Is this the quantum analog of the classical scenario, where when a particle passes through an area ##d \sigma## it is guaranteed to pass through the solid angle ##d \Omega##? Why should this be true? I can't wrap my head around why this claim would be made. What happens, say if we know that a particle passed through an area ##d \sigma##. Would that affect the probability of it passing through the corresponding solid angle ##d \Omega##? To me it seems like the claim is plausible, but a more in depth and hopefully intuitive explanation would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A:It's not true in general that the probability of passing through an area $d\sigma$ is equal to the probability of scattering into a solid angle $d\Omega$. That would only be true if the cross section for the scattering process was independent of the direction of the scattered particle, i.e. $\frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega}$ was independent of $\theta$. This is obviously not true in general, since even for a simple elastic scattering process, the magnitude of the scattering angle depends on the relative momentum of the incoming and outgoing particles.However, Griffiths' statement is true in the case of azimuthally symmetric targets. In this case, the scattering cross section does not depend on the direction of the scattered particle, and thus the probability of passing through an area $d\sigma$ is equal to the probability of scattering into a solid angle $d\Omega$. This can be seen by noting that the probability of scattering into a solid angle $d\Omega$ is proportional to the product $\frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega} \times d\Omega$, where $\frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega}$ is independent of $\theta$. Since the area element $d\sigma$ is related to the solid angle element $d\Omega$ by $d\sigma = r^2 d\Omega$, the two probabilities must be equal.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K