Quantum Spin Measurement: Determining Input State and Probabilities

  • Thread starter Thread starter Delong
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a take-home quiz question related to quantum spin measurement, specifically determining the input state of a beam of atoms based on given probabilities. The user has calculated a linear combination of spin states but is uncertain about the next steps. Other participants express concerns about the appropriateness of seeking help for a take-home exam, suggesting that such queries may not be allowed. They recommend starting a new thread in a dedicated forum for homework help to receive guidance on the textbook question. The conversation highlights the balance between academic integrity and the need for assistance in complex subjects.
Delong
Messages
400
Reaction score
18
I have this take home I would like some help on thanks:
"The spin components of a beam of atoms prepared in the state |ψ>are measured and the following experimental probabilities are obtained:

P+z=1/2
P-Z=1/2
P+x=3/4
P-x=1/4

(i.e., if the beam of atoms goes through a single Stern-Gerlach setup in the x-direction, 3/4 of the particles are measured to have spin up in the x-direction and 1/4 of the particles are measured to have spin down in the x-direction.)

1. From the experimental data, determine the input state as a linear combination of |=>z and |->z (i.e. determine as much of each coefficient of the two states in the sum). Show your work. With no lossof generality, you may assume that the coefficient of |+>z is real but the coefficient of |->z is not.

2. Determine P+y and P-y."


here's my attempt: the linear combination I got is 1/(2)^1/2 for |+>z and -i/(2)^1/2 for |->z. Not sure where to go from there. Thanks for any help I can get!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Delong said:
I have this take home I would like some help on thanks:
"The spin components of a beam of atoms prepared in the state |ψ>are measured and the following experimental probabilities are obtained:

P+z=1/2
P-Z=1/2
P+x=3/4
P-x=1/4

(i.e., if the beam of atoms goes through a single Stern-Gerlach setup in the x-direction, 3/4 of the particles are measured to have spin up in the x-direction and 1/4 of the particles are measured to have spin down in the x-direction.)

1. From the experimental data, determine the input state as a linear combination of |=>z and |->z (i.e. determine as much of each coefficient of the two states in the sum). Show your work. With no lossof generality, you may assume that the coefficient of |+>z is real but the coefficient of |->z is not.

2. Determine P+y and P-y."


here's my attempt: the linear combination I got is 1/(2)^1/2 for |+>z and -i/(2)^1/2 for |->z. Not sure where to go from there. Thanks for any help I can get!

What do you mean by "take home"? Is this question from a take-home exam? If so, are you allowed to ask for tutorial help on the Internet for the exam?
 
It's a take home quiz. I'm don't know if I'm allowed or not but my professor never said anything against it so here I am.
 
Delong said:
It's a take home quiz. I'm don't know if I'm allowed or not but my professor never said anything against it so here I am.

We don't generally help with take-home exams. If you can get an e-mail from the professor, you can PM it to me.
 
It's actually a question from Quantum Mecahnics by David McIntyre and I'd love some direction.
 
once_more said:
It's actually a question from Quantum Mecahnics by David McIntyre and I'd love some direction.
Welcome to the PF.

So it doesn't look like (based on how old this thread is) the OP had permission to get help on his exam question. If you'd like help with the textbook question, please go ahead and start a new thread here in the Homework Help, Advanced Physics forum, and fill out the HH Template that you are provided. You should get good help as long as you show your efforts. :smile:
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top