Quantum Visibility: Imax & Imin Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter suma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum
suma
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi,

What does visibility in interference mean? in quantum mechanics?
V = Imax-Imin/Imax+Imin

but which part of the interference does Imax and Imin refer to?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
With a 50/50 mixture of left (L) and right (R) in the Young slits the probalility on the screen is
##L(x) \overline L (x) + R(x) \overline R (x)## you have no interference.
in the pure case the probability is
##[L(x) + R(x)] \overline {[L(x) + R(x)]}##
These are special cases of
##L(x) \overline L (x) + R(x) \overline R (x) + V[L(x) \overline {R(x)} + R(x) \overline {L (x)}]## for V = 0 and V = 1.
Take V = 0.7 and see what it gives with a graph plotter
 
thanks,

but what is the meaning of visibility? does visibility means chance of seeing interference?

is the V in your equation the visibility? there is a minus sign in the intensity form

are L(x) and R(x) operators?

thanks
 
No L(x) and R(x) are the probability amplitudes that the photon hits the screen at x after having passed thru the Left slit (or the Right slit)
Suppose now that behind the slits there is a device that let 80% of the photon pass thru the unmodified Young slits but that every 20% it randomly obturates one of the slits.
We will have V = 0.8
The probability curve on the screen will be sandwiched between two envelopes.
It will look like that
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top