Can Quartz Crystals Convert Heat to AC Electricity?

AI Thread Summary
Quartz crystals are piezoelectric, meaning they convert mechanical energy, such as vibration, into electrical energy, but they do not convert heat energy to AC electrical energy. For a quartz crystal to generate voltage, it must be deformed along a specific axis, which is not achievable when subjected to random impacts from gas molecules. Immersing a quartz crystal in a hot gas would not produce any useful vibration or deformation, thus failing to generate electrical energy. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the specific conditions required for piezoelectric effects. Overall, quartz crystals cannot directly convert heat energy into electrical energy.
duordi134
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
Quartz crystals are used in clocks to regulate time measurement.
Does a quartz crystal convert heat energy to AC electrical energy?

Duordi
 
Physics news on Phys.org
duordi134 said:
Quartz crystals are used in clocks to regulate time measurement.
Does a quartz crystal convert heat energy to AC electrical energy?

Duordi

Duordi, Welcome to Physics Forums!

Quartz crystals do not convert heat energy to AC electrical energy. They are piezoelectric, which means they convert mechanical energy (say vibration) into electrical energy. Interestingly, they work in the reverse, also. When an electrical signal, say a voltage, is applied, the crystal deforms mechanically.

You can learn all about them if you want to. May I suggest you begin with these two sites?
http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/oscillator/crystal.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystal_oscillator

Cheers,
Bobbywhy
 


So if a crystal was immersed in a gas which would strike the crystal every so often
causing it to remain vibrating then the crystal would constantly provide an electric current.

This may not be a useful condition because of its minute capacity but it would be a direct conversion of heat energy (motion of the gas molecules) to electrical energy.

durodi
 
durodi, Interesting hypothesis, but I don’t think it works the way you propose. Did you visit the two sites I recommended? There the physical deformation of a crystal and the resultant charge generation is clearly described.

A quartz (piezoelectric) crystal must be deformed along a particular axis in a well-defined direction in order to produce a voltage.

A quartz crystal immersed in a hot gas will be bombarded by rapidly moving molecules. But they will impact on the crystal from all directions, and therefore exerting a force on the crystal in all directions. The result will not be any vibration, deformation, or voltage generated. So there would be no conversion of heat energy to electrical energy.

Nice try, durodi. I encourage you to continue your searching. This is how new discoveries are made.

Cheers,
Bobbywhy
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top