Qubit Spin Convention: |0> & |1> Eigenvectors?

lewis198
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
This is a bit embarrassing, but by convention does |0> = (1,0)^T and
|1>=(0,1)^T, where we are in the basis of the eigenvectors of \sigma_{z}?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The notation is a bit misleading, since |0\rangle is most commonly used to denote the ground state of a system. However, in the absence of an external field, both spin states have the same energy. The justification for using the notation is the convention that in a communications protocol, one state must be chosen to signal binary 0 vs binary 1 for the other state. There's no particular reason to choose one over the other, but indeed the spin up state is conventionally chosen to be the off bit, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qubit#Physical_representation
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top