Question about chemical nomenclature

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the existence of cis and trans forms of 1,3-dibromo-1,3-dimethylcyclobutane. The distinction is clarified through the examination of 3D structures, where the trans configuration places substituents on opposite sides, while the cis configuration has them on the same side. It is noted that the molecule cannot rotate around the axis of the single bonds due to the rigidity of the cyclobutane ring, which requires breaking a bond or forcing a methyl group through the ring to interconvert between the two forms. The participants express gratitude for the clarification provided.
yeung2743
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I want to know why there are cis- and trans form of 1,3dibromo-1,3-dimethylcyclobutane?

and anybody explain it to me thanks a lot
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
If you look at the 3d structures it should be fairly obvious
Trans ("other side") to the right, cis (same side") to the left.
 

Attachments

  • Cbu2.jpg
    Cbu2.jpg
    19 KB · Views: 480
Last edited:
Nemus said:
If you look at the 3d structures it should be fairly obvious
Trans ("other side") to the right, cis (same side") to the left.

and it can't rotate around the axis of the single bond
 
No, there are two single bonds locking it in a stiff ring so you either have to break a bond or squeeze a methyl group through the center of the ring to interconvert them.
 
I understand now
Thx all you three guys ^^
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top