Question about chromate-dichromate equilibrium?

  • Thread starter Thread starter HelloMotto
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equilibrium
AI Thread Summary
Adding HCl to a chromate solution shifts the equilibrium to produce dichromate, resulting in an orange color due to the excess hydrogen ions. When HCl is added to a dichromate solution, the color change is similar, raising questions about the underlying chemistry. The equilibrium equation provided, 2[CrO4]^-2 + [H]+ <--> [Cr2O7]^-2 + H2O, is correct. Dissolving dichromate in pure water would not produce the same color change, indicating the role of hydrogen ions in the reaction. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for explaining the observed color changes in different conditions.
HelloMotto
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
Ok so when i add HCl to a chromate solution, it turns orange (dichromate) because the equilibrium shifts to the right, inorder to reduce the excess hydrogen ions from the HCl Acid.

But when I add HCl to dichromate, the color changes the same. How do i explain this phenomenon.

and is this the right equation?


2[CrO4]-2 + [H]+ <---> [Cr2O7]-2 + H2O
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Equation is OK.

Take a look at it - what would you expect if you dissolve dichromate in pure water?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top