Question about continued fraction representations

In summary, continued fraction representations are powerful in that they can be used to exactly represent some irrational numbers. However, they cannot represent any root of an nth degree polynomial equation, especially for n>4, as these higher degree algebraic numbers do not admit a finite or periodic continued fraction representation. It is possible to have infinite continued fractions for some irrational numbers, but these cannot be considered closed-form solutions. Overall, continued fraction representations are similar to power series.
  • #1
japplepie
93
0
How powerful are continued fraction representations?

From what I understand, they could be used to exactly represent some irrational numbers

So, could they represent any root of an nth degree polynomial equation?

Specially where n>4, since 5th degree roots are not guaranteed to have an algebraic representation.
-------------------------------
And if they do, will there be a possibility to have a quintic formula which isn't an algebraic solution, but rather an continued fraction solution
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
An irrational [itex]\xi[/itex] admits a finite or periodic continued fraction representation if and only if there exist integers [itex]a, b, c, d[/itex] with [itex]c \geq 1[/itex] and [itex]d[/itex] nonzero such that

[itex]\displaystyle \xi = \frac{a + b \sqrt{c}}{d}[/itex]

So in short the answer to your question is no; the only classes of numbers which admit finite or periodic continued fraction representations are integers, rationals, and roots to quadratic polynomials (also known as "quadratic surds"). Any higher degree algebraic number does not admit a periodic continued fraction representation.

Of course, it is possible to have infinite continued fractions with a finitely representable series of coefficients (e.g. some aperiodic pattern, for instance the CF for [itex]e[/itex]) however this does not involve finitely many operations and so cannot be considered a closed-form solution.
 
  • Like
Likes japplepie
  • #3
japplepie said:
How powerful are continued fraction representations?
They are very similar to power series.

From what I understand, they could be used to exactly represent some irrational numbers
No finite length continued fraction with rational numbers can represent an irrational number. The term "continued fractions" includes infinitely long continued fractions. They can represent irrational numbers.
 
  • Like
Likes japplepie

1. What is a continued fraction representation?

A continued fraction representation is a way of expressing a real number as a sequence of fractions, where each fraction is the sum of an integer and the reciprocal of another fraction. It is denoted by [a0; a1, a2, a3, ...].

2. How is a continued fraction representation different from a decimal representation?

A decimal representation expresses a real number as a finite or repeating sequence of digits, while a continued fraction representation is an infinite sequence of fractions. Continued fractions are often more accurate and can reveal patterns and relationships between numbers.

3. What is the purpose of using continued fraction representations?

Continued fraction representations have several applications in mathematics and science. They can be used to approximate irrational numbers, solve certain types of equations, and understand the behavior of complex systems. They also have connections to other areas of mathematics, such as number theory and chaotic systems.

4. Can any real number be represented as a continued fraction?

Yes, any real number can be represented as a continued fraction. However, some numbers have finite representations (such as integers and rational numbers) while others have infinite representations (such as irrational numbers).

5. Are there any limitations to using continued fraction representations?

Continued fraction representations can become increasingly complex and difficult to calculate for certain numbers, making them less practical in some situations. They also cannot accurately represent some numbers, such as transcendental numbers, which have infinite and non-repeating decimal representations.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
414
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Computing and Technology
Replies
4
Views
768
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
985
  • Sticky
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
2
Views
961
Replies
14
Views
2K
Back
Top