B Question About Dark Energy

AI Thread Summary
In discussions about dark energy, it's noted that matter from an explosion initially accelerates but does not continue to do so indefinitely. The expansion of matter is influenced by its temperature, leading to a radial velocity that stabilizes over time. The idea that this acceleration could explain the universe's ongoing expansion is challenged, as the Big Bang is not considered an explosion into pre-existing space. The source of continuous acceleration remains a key question in cosmology. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for comprehending the universe's expansion.
zuz
Messages
100
Reaction score
36
When there is an explosion, matter flies off in every direction. At first it is static, and then it accelerates, and keeps accelerating, until friction slows it down to a stop. In a vacuum would this matter continue to accelerate indefinitely? And could this be the cause of the continued expansion and acceleration of the universe?
 
Space news on Phys.org
During an explosion, matter is accelerated outwards. The velocity does not continue to increase forever. The expansion following an explosion has a radial velocity determined by the temperature of the matter.
 
zuz said:
At first it is static, and then it accelerates, and keeps accelerating,
And where do you suppose the force comes from for this continuing acceleration???
 
zuz said:
could this be the cause of the continued expansion and acceleration of the universe?
No. The Big Bang was not an explosion into a pre-existing space.
 

Thread 'Matter density right after the decoupling'

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
View full post »

Thread 'Rutgers finds a transparent Einstein Cross - apparently a dark matter "halo".'

The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
View full post »

Thread 'Big Bang and Infinite Universe'

Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Entropy reversal in an infinite static universe?
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Hubble Constant, Dark Energy and the Expanding Universe
Replies
15
Views
3K
B Dark Energy, Dark Matter and the Speed of Light
Replies
23
Views
3K
I Dark energy and the kinematic Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect?
Replies
22
Views
2K
I More extended equilibrium configurations due to dark energy?
Replies
19
Views
2K
B Other lines of evidence for Dark Energy? (Besides supernova data)
Replies
18
Views
2K
I Vacuum up-tunneling with high-energy events?
Replies
0
Views
2K
B Does Negative Mass Impact Expansion in Vacuum Space?
Replies
6
Views
2K
B How do the candidates for Dark Energy 'work'?
Replies
4
Views
2K
A Black hole mass coupled to expansion -- astrophysical source of dark energy?
3
Replies
134
Views
10K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top