Question about dielectrics in capacitors

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jaredvert
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitors Dielectrics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the role of dielectrics in capacitors, specifically questioning why insulators are used instead of conductors. Participants explore the implications of using conductors, the nature of polarization, and the effects on capacitance and voltage ratings.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the necessity of an insulator between capacitor plates, suggesting that a conductor not touching the plates could also reduce the electric field.
  • Another participant explains that the dielectric replaces air and is essential for proper functioning, but reiterates the question about using a conductor without contact.
  • Some participants argue that introducing a conductor would effectively split the capacitor into two, reducing voltage ratings and potentially degrading performance.
  • There is a discussion about the trade-offs between maximum operating voltage and obtainable capacitance, with references to electrolytic capacitors and their construction.
  • Concerns are raised about voltage breakdown when using conductors, with a request for clarification on what voltage breakdown entails.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the use of conductors versus dielectrics, with no consensus reached on the best approach or the implications of each choice.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various factors such as leakage, polarization, and the physical characteristics of materials, but these points remain unresolved and depend on specific definitions and conditions.

jaredvert
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
How come an insulator is put in between two capacitors? I realize it is to polarize the atoms and create a smaller electric field and hence smaller electric pressure/voltage and increase the capacitance. But why not use a conductor? Pretty much all the charge would cancel. OR am I missing a huge detail in that insulators actually TouCH the capacitors? If so then that explains why you couldn't use a conductor (since the charge would cancel) but why not use a conductor but just have it not touch either capacitor? Isn't that still polarization and the electric field become smaller? Please elucidate. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
UltrafastPED said:
The dielectric fills the space between the plates (or coiled sheets) - it is simply a replacement for the air, which is also a dielectric.

How it works is explained here: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/dielec.html
But why not use a conductor, but just not have it touch the plates of the capacitor? That way no "leakage" but an effectively smaller electric field
 
The question seems pertinent to the definition of a capacitor "simply two conducting plates separated by some distance". Addition of another conductor in between them will be tantamount to splitting the capacitor into two capacitors such that:
Voltage rating of the each new capacitor was halved (if the introduced plate was of negligible thickness). Practically it will be reduced even more.
Capacitance of the individual capacitor would be doubled due to reduction of the new separation to half of the original one.
Now visualize these two "new capacitors" as if they were connected in series and see if they are different from the original capacitor i.e. before introduction of the mid plate. They are the same if the mid plate is of "zero" thickness. Otherwise it has degraded by all means - leaving no benefit to do that

Regards
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy
Zafariqbal82 said:
The question seems pertinent to the definition of a capacitor "simply two conducting plates separated by some distance". Addition of another conductor in between them will be tantamount to splitting the capacitor into two capacitors such that:
Voltage rating of the each new capacitor was halved (if the introduced plate was of negligible thickness). Practically it will be reduced even more.
Capacitance of the individual capacitor would be doubled due to reduction of the new separation to half of the original one.
Now visualize these two "new capacitors" as if they were connected in series and see if they are different from the original capacitor i.e. before introduction of the mid plate. They are the same if the mid plate is of "zero" thickness. Otherwise it has degraded by all means - leaving no benefit to do that

Regards
I love that answer! Great job. Cookie for you!
 
My pleasure
 
Where should I send this cookie to?
 
jaredvert said:
But why not use a conductor, but just not have it touch the plates of the capacitor? That way no "leakage" but an effectively smaller electric field

In principle, you could fill the dielectric space with a conductor - leaving a minuscule air gap. That would produce a very high value of capacitance but a maximum operating voltage which would be ridiculously small, because the gap would break down so easily. Using an appropriate material as a insulator (dielectric) means that the ready polarisation of the dielectric allows a charge build up right next to each of the capacitor plates without voltage breakdown. So, in many respects, the dielectric gives the effect of a much smaller gap.

There is a compromise between Max Operating Voltage and Max Obtainable Capacitance, for any particular technology and allowable physical sizes for the Capacitor. Electrolytic capacitors are operated with a continuous offset voltage across them which deposits (electrolytically) a very thin layer of dielectric between the plates, giving a much higher Capacitance than if you were to use plastic / mica / paper etc.. See also the construction of SuperCapacitors (loads of Google Hits).
 
sophiecentaur said:
In principle, you could fill the dielectric space with a conductor - leaving a minuscule air gap. That would produce a very high value of capacitance but a maximum operating voltage which would be ridiculously small, because the gap would break down so easily. Using an appropriate material as a insulator (dielectric) means that the ready polarisation of the dielectric allows a charge build up right next to each of the capacitor plates without voltage breakdown. So, in many respects, the dielectric gives the effect of a much smaller gap.
There is a compromise between Max Operating Voltage and Max Obtainable Capacitance, for any particular technology and allowable physical sizes for the Capacitor. Electrolytic capacitors are operated with a continuous offset voltage across them which deposits (electrolytically) a very thin layer of dielectric between the plates, giving a much higher Capacitance than if you were to use plastic / mica / paper etc.. See also the construction of SuperCapacitors (loads of Google Hits).
What is voltage breakdown exactly? How does it occur?
 
  • #10

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
152
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K