Question about Dimensions (very basic)

  • Thread starter Thread starter ashimb9
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimensions
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the dimensional correctness of two equations. For the first equation, y = (2 m) cos(k x) with k = 2 m-1, participants clarify that cosine functions are dimensionless, allowing for the equation to be dimensionally correct if k and x are appropriately defined in meters. In the second equation, v = v0 + a x, the confusion arises over the units of acceleration and velocity, leading to a conclusion that the equation is inconsistent without clear definitions. For the volume function V = A + (B/t) + Ct^4, the consensus suggests that the dimension of C should be L^3/T^4, ensuring all terms are consistent in units of volume. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the importance of unit consistency in dimensional analysis.
ashimb9
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
1) Which of the equations below is dimension-
ally correct?
a. y = (2 m) cos(k x), k = 2 m-1
b. v = v0 + a x

my work for:
a) cos(kx) = 2ym-1
So this would lead to k = (1/x)cos-1(2ym-1)

But i don't know whether the COSINE operation on RHS changes m-1 to any other unit or not. So, please help me with that.

b) in this case i thought that the presence of two unknown quantities with unknown units on the RHS would mean that the dimension of "v" is correct or not. So i would say it cannot be determined


2) The volume of an object is given as a func-
tion of time by V = A+(B/t)+Ct4. Determine
the dimension of the constant C.
1. L2/T4
2. L4/T3
3. L3/T4
4. L/T
5. L/T4

My work:

V = A+(B/t)+Ct4
so, V=A+(B+Ct5/t)
or, C= {[(V-A)t]-B}/t5

Which i thought would give the dimension for C as L/T4. But i am not sure at all so please help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
ashimb9 said:
1) Which of the equations below is dimension-
ally correct?
a. y = (2 m) cos(k x), k = 2 m-1

Sorry I don't understand your use of m in this equation. Are you intending that m is some unit like mass?

ashimb9 said:
b. v = v0 + a x
Again what is the units of a? Are you meaning acceleration here? Is V units of velocity? If a is supposed to be x/t2 and v in units of x/t then no the equation is not consistent as the last term is apparently x2/t2 and not x/t.
ashimb9 said:
2) The volume of an object is given as a func-
tion of time by V = A+(B/t)+Ct4. Determine
the dimension of the constant C.
1. L2/T4
2. L4/T3
3. L3/T4
4. L/T
5. L/T4

Here doesn't each term have to be in units of volume? Doesn't that require the last term Ct4 to be in units of L3?
 
see that is the question. i posted them as is, without ANY modification and that's the same thing i thght. what does "a" and other variables mean and what are their units. nothing is given.
 
ashimb9 said:
see that is the question. i posted them as is, without ANY modification and that's the same thing i thght. what does "a" and other variables mean and what are their units. nothing is given.

That may be true for question 1. But your answer to question 2 is apparently figured incorrectly.
 
apparently the rite answer for the second question was 3 which is L3/T4. apparently the first one is the correct one in the first question. well thanks for helpin out
 
My guess is that in 1a, the use of "m" is intended to be meters. The use of m^-1 in the given value of k seems to indicate this.

I'd like to point out something that you may have forgotten from trig. Sine/Cosine, etc are dimensionless functions. They have no dimensions. Remember their definitions from triangles.

Sine(theta) = opposite side / hypotenuse
Cos(theta) = adjacent side / hypotenuse
etc

In any ratio like this the numerator (top) units will cancel the denominator (bottom) units. So it doesn't matter if the triangle sides will be measured in feet, meters, inches, thumb widths, etc. The units will always cancel and the answer (a ratio) will be the same for all units.

So you can ignore the cosine in 1a and use just what's out front. BUT...You DO have to take into account if the quantity inside the () of the cosine come out to radians. Sometimes the convention is not to explicitely type out radians in the units because radians is itself defined as a ratio. So I would check that "kx" comes out with no units in order to be correct for inside the cosine.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top