Question about distant galaxies

  • Thread starter Thread starter Heuristix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Galaxies
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the observation of distant galaxies and how their light informs us about the early universe. It highlights the confusion regarding the distance of these galaxies when the light was emitted versus their current distance due to the universe's expansion. While the light from these galaxies has traveled for over 13 billion years, they were indeed much closer at the time the light was emitted. The expansion of the universe means that galaxies are now significantly farther away than they were when the light began its journey. This illustrates the complexities of cosmic distances and the implications of an expanding universe on our understanding of astronomical observations.
Heuristix
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
It is often stated that observation of the most distant stars inform us about the early universe because the light we observe now was emitted from the stars when the universe was young. In fact this is a quote from space.com:

"The universe is about 13.7 billion years old. Light reaching us from the earliest known galaxies has been travelling, therefore, for more than 13 billion years."

I, as a lay person, am puzzled by this because I would have expected those stars to have been much closer to us when the universe was young (than they are now) and only moved away with the expansion of the universe. So in the example above, why did it take light 13 billion years to get to earth? Would not those stars have been much closer to us when the light was emitted?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The galaxies were closer then than they are now, yes. The quote doesn't say either how close they were then nor how far they are now.

Since the universe is expanding, though the light traveled 13 billion light years, the galaxies would have been closer than 13 billion light years when the light was emitted. And at the same time, they would be much further than that now.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top