Question about Higgs fields in SU(5) GUT.

In summary, the conversation discusses the SU(5) grand unified theory and its two sets of Higgs fields, the {5} and {24} representations. It is noted that the {24} representation breaks SU(5) down to SU(3)c*SU(2)l*U(1)y and gives mass to X gauge bosons, while the {5} representation breaks it further down to SU(3)c*U(1)em and gives mass to W+- and Z gauge bosons. However, only the {5} representation is able to directly give mass to fermions through a Yukawa coupling. The conversation also mentions the 45 representation and its potential for giving mass corrections to fermions. The
  • #1
Max
[[Mod. note -- I have "repaired" various non-ASCII characters as best
as I can, but it's *much* safer if postings are submitted in 7-bit-ASCII
only. In particular, Microsoft Windows "smart quotes" tend to get
quite mangled before they arrive at s.p.r moderstors' mailboxes... :(
-- jt]]

In the SU(5) grand unified theory, there are two sets of Higgs fields.
They are the {5} and {24} representations (we don't consider {45}
here). {24} breaks SU(5) down to SU(3)c*SU(2)l*U(1)y, and gives mass
to X gauge bosons via Higgs mechanism. {5} breaks SU(3)c*SU(2)l*U(1)y
further down to SU(3)c*U(1)em, and gives mass to W+- and Z gauge
bosons.

However, only {5} gives mass directly to the fermions via a Yukawa
type coupling. The conventional wisdom is that the "Higgs
representation must appear in the tensor product of the SU(5)
representations in which the fermion and its antifermion
appear." (H.Georgi's Lie Algebras in Particle Physics, Page 234-235).

This reasoning sounds empirical to me, because it's based on the way
fermion and its antifermion are assigned to different representations
of SU(5). Is there any first principle which explains why {24} is not
mass generating for fermions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
On Dec 13, 5:07 pm, Max <aws...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> [[Mod. note -- I have "repaired" various non-ASCII characters as best
> as I can, but it's *much* safer if postings are submitted in 7-bit-ASCII
> only.  In particular, Microsoft Windows "smart quotes" tend to get
> quite mangled before they arrive at s.p.r moderstors' mailboxes... :(
> -- jt]]
>
> In the SU(5) grand unified theory, there are two sets of Higgs fields.
> They are the {5} and {24} representations (we don't consider {45}
> here). {24} breaks SU(5) down to SU(3)c*SU(2)l*U(1)y, and gives mass
> to X gauge bosons via Higgs mechanism. {5} breaks SU(3)c*SU(2)l*U(1)y
> further down to SU(3)c*U(1)em, and gives mass to W+- and Z gauge
> bosons.
>
> However, only {5} gives mass directly to the fermions via a Yukawa
> type coupling. The conventional wisdom is that the "Higgs
> representation must appear in the tensor product of the SU(5)
> representations in which the fermion and its antifermion
> appear." (H.Georgi's Lie Algebras in Particle Physics, Page 234-235).
>
> This reasoning sounds empirical to me, because it's based on the way
> fermion and its antifermion are assigned to different representations
> of SU(5). Is there any first principle which explains why {24} is not
> mass generating for fermions?


Good question!

First, a bit of group theory. Let's ignore U(1) for now, because it
only will complicate things, and I think I can show you qualitatively
how it works without complicating things.

The first thing to know is how the representations of SU(5) break down
under SU(3)xSU(2). I am mostly wrong when I try to remember things,
but I can tell you where to look to check my answers: there is a
wonderful reference by Richard Slansky called "Group Theory for
Unified Model Building", which is available online at spires. There
are extensive tables in the back that show you all of this info.
Anyway, the SU(5) reps break into the following reps under SU(3)xSU
(2):

5 -> (3,1) + (1,2)
10 -> (3,2) + (3,1) + (1,1)
24 -> (8,1) + (1,3) + (3,2) + (3*,2*) + (1,1).

Now hopefully you can start to see the problem---the 24 doesn't have
an appropriate electroweak higgs candidate! The EW higgs HAS to
transform like (1,2), so it is ONLY the 5 that has the appropriate
content.

Now, you mentioned the 45. It COULD be that the 45 can give you a
correction to fermion masses. Indeed, it has to because that's why
people use it. In this case, you can look in Slansky's book yourself
and see how the 45 decomposes. Then, if you're ambitious, you can
work out how they couple to the SU(5) fermions, and compute mass
corrections. There's probably a review paper by Pavel Perez where
this is all worked out---he's the leader (I guess) when it comes to
non-SUSY SU(5) theories.

Anyway, hope this helps.
 
  • #3
On Dec 14, 3:55 am, BenTheMan <BenDun...@gmail.com> wrote:
> there is a
> wonderful reference by Richard Slansky called "Group Theory for
> Unified Model Building",


Thanks for the reference

> the 24 doesn't have
> an appropriate electroweak higgs candidate!  The EW higgs HAS to
> transform like (1,2), so it is ONLY the 5 that has the appropriate
> content.


I am fully aware that 24 doesn’t break the electroweak symmetry. The
question is why 24 is not mass generating for fermions including
leptons and quarks. In other words, why are fermion masses tied to
electroweak symmetry breaking, rather than SU(5) -> SU(3)c*SU(2)l*U(1)
y symmetry breaking?

-Max
 
  • #4
On Dec 14, 3:59 pm, Max <aws...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Dec 14, 3:55 am, BenTheMan <BenDun...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >  there is a
> > wonderful reference by Richard Slansky called "Group Theory for
> > Unified Model Building",

>
> Thanks for the reference
>
> > the 24 doesn't have
> > an appropriate electroweak higgs candidate!  The EW higgs HAS to
> > transform like (1,2), so it is ONLY the 5 that has the appropriate
> > content.

>
> I am fully aware that 24 doesn’t break the electroweak symmetry. The
> question is why 24 is not mass generating for fermions including
> leptons and quarks. In other words, why are fermion masses tied to
> electroweak symmetry breaking, rather than SU(5) -> SU(3)c*SU(2)l*U(1)
> y symmetry breaking?
>
> -Max


Write out a fermion mass term and look at the quantum numbers. You
should see that, in order to be gauge invariant, the mass term has to
transform like (1,2). The only possible (dimension 4) mass term that
you can write involves the normal, electroweak higgs.
 
  • #5
On Dec 15, 12:01 pm, h...@fb07-hees.theo.physik.uni-giessen.de
(Hendrik van Hees) wrote:
> Write out a fermion mass term and look at the quantum numbers. You
> should see that, in order to be gauge invariant, the mass term has to
> transform like (1,2). The only possible (dimension 4) mass term that
> you can write involves the normal, electroweak higgs.-


Thanks for the explanation. How about a Majorana mass term, instead of
the Dirac mass term? Would 24 generate Majorana mass for fermions?

-Max
 

1. What is a Higgs field in SU(5) GUT?

A Higgs field in SU(5) GUT (Grand Unified Theory) is a hypothetical field that is responsible for giving particles their mass. It is a key component of the Standard Model of particle physics, and its existence is supported by experimental evidence.

2. How does the Higgs field interact with particles in SU(5) GUT?

The Higgs field interacts with particles through the Higgs mechanism, which involves the exchange of virtual Higgs bosons between particles. This interaction is what gives particles their mass.

3. What is the role of the Higgs field in the formation of the universe?

The Higgs field played a crucial role in the formation of the universe by allowing particles to acquire mass during the Big Bang. Without the Higgs field, particles would have remained massless and the universe would have been vastly different.

4. Is the existence of the Higgs field in SU(5) GUT proven?

While there is strong evidence for the existence of the Higgs field, it has not yet been directly observed or measured. Scientists are currently conducting experiments at the Large Hadron Collider to try and detect the Higgs field and its associated particle, the Higgs boson.

5. Can the Higgs field in SU(5) GUT help explain the unification of the fundamental forces?

Yes, the Higgs field is a key component of the Grand Unified Theory (GUT), which seeks to unify the electromagnetic, weak, and strong nuclear forces into one unified force. The Higgs field's role in giving particles their mass is an important aspect of this theory.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
999
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top