##SU(2)## doublets, Majorana Fermions and Higgs

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
11 replies · 3K views
spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31
Say ##L## and ##L^{c}## are a pair of ##SU(2)## doublets (electroweak-charge fermions) and ##N_{1}## and ##N_{1}^{c}## are a pair of neutral Majorana fermions.

Say that these fermions couple to the Higgs via Yukawa coupling and have vector masses ##M_0## and ##M_1## respectively:

$$M_{0}LL^{c} + M_{1}N_{1}N_{1}^{c} + YHLN_{1}^{c} + Y^{c}H^{\dagger}L^{c}N_{1}$$What is the difference between ##L## and ##L^{c}##?

What does the superscript ##c## signify?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How does the ##LL^{c}## term break ##SU(2)## gauge invariance?
 
I really meant to say SU(2)xU(1). You are missing a number of bars on your fermion fields. The term ##\bar L L^c## is not a hypercharge singlet because ##\bar L## and ##L^c## have the same hypercharge.
 
Orodruin said:
I really meant to say SU(2)xU(1). You are missing a number of bars on your fermion fields. The term ##\bar L L^c## is not a hypercharge singlet because ##\bar L## and ##L^c## have the same hypercharge.

But, ##L## is the complex conjugate of ##L^{c}##. So, isn't ##LL^{c}## a scalar?

Why then do we need to have ##\bar{L}L^{c}##?
 
They are being sloppy. Any specialist reading that is going to understand what they mean.
 
Okay, in the Dirac Lagrangian, it is possible to have the mass term ##m\bar{\psi}\psi##.

So, why can't we have the term ##M_{0}\bar{L}L## and not ##M_{0}\bar{L}L^{c}## here?
 
The first one because you cannot have a mass term involving two left-handed fields. The second because it violates gauge invariance.
 
So, let me get this right:

the correct term is ##M_{0}LL^{c}## and not ##M_{0}\bar{L}L^{c}##?
 
Also, why is ##M_0## called the vector mass and not simply the mass?