Question about hypothesis testing

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the use of the z-test formula for hypothesis testing, specifically when testing a population mean with a known standard deviation. For a one-sided test, the alpha level is set directly to the desired significance level, while for a two-sided test, the alpha level is divided by two to account for both tails of the distribution. This distinction is crucial for determining the critical values needed to reject the null hypothesis. Understanding these concepts helps alleviate confusion surrounding hypothesis testing. Properly applying these principles is essential for accurate statistical analysis.
semidevil
Messages
156
Reaction score
2
i'm getting my concepts very confused now...

so the formula for the normal distri is (y - u)/(sigma)/((sqroot(n)).

so if I want to test y, I set that formula = to alpha(where alpha is the confidence level).

that is if it is one sided. if it is 2 sided, do I still set it to alpha, or alpha/2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i'm pretty sure if it's 2 sided then you set it to \frac{\alpha}{2}
 


It is understandable to feel confused about hypothesis testing, as it can be a complex topic. However, it is important to clarify some concepts to better understand the formula and how to use it in hypothesis testing.

Firstly, the formula you mentioned is the formula for the z-test, which is used to test hypotheses involving a population mean when the population standard deviation is known. This formula is used to calculate the z-score, which is then compared to a critical value to determine the statistical significance of the results.

Secondly, when conducting a one-sided test, the alpha level is typically set to the desired level of significance (e.g. 0.05 or 0.01). This means that the calculated z-score needs to be equal to or greater than the critical value in order to reject the null hypothesis. However, for a two-sided test, the alpha level is divided by 2 and used for both tails of the distribution. This is because a two-sided test is concerned with the possibility of a significant difference in either direction, so we need to account for both tails of the distribution.

In summary, for a one-sided test, the formula is set equal to the alpha level, and for a two-sided test, the formula is set equal to alpha/2. I hope this helps clarify your confusion about hypothesis testing. Remember to always carefully consider the type of test you are conducting and the appropriate alpha level to use.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top