Question about isomorphic mapping on direct sums?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ishida52134
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mapping Sums
Ishida52134
Messages
138
Reaction score
0
The identity map on the direct sum of V1 and V2 would be i1 composed with p1 + i2 composed with p2. Would such an identity map exist for an infinite direct sum? And an analogous mapping for a direct product?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're given:
- V = \bigoplus_{a\in A} V_a, where A is some possibly infinite index set.
- For each a\in A, the inclusion map \iota_a: V_a \to V given by \iota_a(x_a) = (x_a, (0_b)_{b\in A\setminus\{a\}}).
- For each a\in A, the projection map \pi_a: V \to V_a given by \pi_a(x) = (x_a).

You've noticed that, if |A|<\infty, then \sum_{a\in A} \iota_a\circ\pi_a = id_V: V\to V.

So you're asking whether the condition that |A|<\infty can be dropped to draw the same conclusion? The answer is essentially
1) Yes.
2) One has to be careful about the definition of \sum_{a\in A} when A is infinite.
3) There's very little content here, as point (2) is essentially built into the definition of a direct sum.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top