Question about isomorphic mapping on direct sums?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ishida52134
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mapping Sums
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the identity map for the direct sum of vector spaces, specifically addressing whether the condition of a finite index set |A| can be relaxed for infinite direct sums. The identity map is expressed as the composition of inclusion and projection maps, i.e., i1 composed with p1 + i2 composed with p2. The conclusion confirms that while the identity map exists for finite direct sums, care must be taken with the definition of the sum when dealing with infinite sets, as this is inherently part of the direct sum's definition.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector spaces and direct sums
  • Familiarity with inclusion maps and projection maps
  • Knowledge of infinite sets and their properties
  • Basic concepts of linear algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of direct sums in vector spaces
  • Explore the implications of infinite index sets in linear algebra
  • Learn about the formal definitions of inclusion and projection maps
  • Investigate the differences between direct sums and direct products in vector spaces
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in linear algebra, educators teaching vector space theory, and students seeking to deepen their understanding of direct sums and mappings in infinite-dimensional spaces.

Ishida52134
Messages
138
Reaction score
0
The identity map on the direct sum of V1 and V2 would be i1 composed with p1 + i2 composed with p2. Would such an identity map exist for an infinite direct sum? And an analogous mapping for a direct product?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're given:
- [itex]V = \bigoplus_{a\in A} V_a[/itex], where [itex]A[/itex] is some possibly infinite index set.
- For each [itex]a\in A[/itex], the inclusion map [itex]\iota_a: V_a \to V[/itex] given by [itex]\iota_a(x_a) = (x_a, (0_b)_{b\in A\setminus\{a\}})[/itex].
- For each [itex]a\in A[/itex], the projection map [itex]\pi_a: V \to V_a[/itex] given by [itex]\pi_a(x) = (x_a)[/itex].

You've noticed that, if [itex]|A|<\infty[/itex], then [itex]\sum_{a\in A} \iota_a\circ\pi_a = id_V: V\to V[/itex].

So you're asking whether the condition that [itex]|A|<\infty[/itex] can be dropped to draw the same conclusion? The answer is essentially
1) Yes.
2) One has to be careful about the definition of [itex]\sum_{a\in A}[/itex] when [itex]A[/itex] is infinite.
3) There's very little content here, as point (2) is essentially built into the definition of a direct sum.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K