Question about maintaining centrifugal force

AI Thread Summary
Artificial gravity on Mars missions could be achieved by spinning sections of a spacecraft or a large ring, creating centrifugal force to simulate gravity. While there is minimal air resistance in space, periodic adjustments may be needed to counteract solar wind effects. Initiating rotation could potentially be done using reaction wheels or control-moment gyros, similar to satellite technology. The lack of attempts to implement this concept in space may be due to engineering challenges and the complexities of maintaining the center of mass. Overall, the idea remains a popular topic in both scientific discussions and science fiction.
FlyingKiwi
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey all,

I recently read a bit about proposals to induce "artificial gravity" on a Mars mission by spinning two sections of a spacecraft on a long cable in order to create a centrifugal force that would simulate gravity by pulling astronauts outward toward the floor of their capsule, or, similarly, a space station that consisted of a very large ring spinning at a certain RPM. My initial thought is that as people moved around within the spacecraft or station, it could shift the center of mass, thereby causing some weird effects that would have to be somehow compensated for, though perhaps I'm mistaken in assuming this.

My question is whether or not the rotation of the said objects would be maintained, or if additional propellant would be required to periodically "re-boost" the rotation of a station or spacecraft in order to maintain the desired RPM? Thanks!,

-FK
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The usual proposal is to have two (or more) balancing arms, or even a ring, that is revolving.

Since there is no air resistance in space, there should be little need to boost the rotational speed, but there will be attitude adjustments due to the solar wind.
 
UltrafastPED said:
The usual proposal is to have two (or more) balancing arms, or even a ring, that is revolving.

Since there is no air resistance in space, there should be little need to boost the rotational speed, but there will be attitude adjustments due to the solar wind.

Interesting, thanks. Two more questions:

- Could the rotation of the station/ spacecraft be initiated by a reaction wheel or control-moment gyro like many satellites use? If not, why?

- Any idea why this hasn't been attempted in space? It doesn't seem like one would need to add a significant amount of mass to the orbital payload in order to get, say, a 100-meter cable into orbit that could attach a spent booster to a spacecraft . Assuming the center of mass was exactly between the two objects, if I've calculated this right, you'd only need an RPM of 4.2 to induce a centrifugal force equivalent to that of Earth's gravity at the surface (if R = 50m, V = 22 m/s)


Thanks!

-FK
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top