Question about Maxwell's Equations

AI Thread Summary
It is not possible to derive Faraday's Law from the other three Maxwell's equations and the conservation of charge, as Faraday's Law is fundamentally distinct and pertains solely to electromagnetic fields. The discussion emphasizes that while the divergence of the curl H equation can lead to the continuity equation, this does not allow for deriving Faraday's Law. Instead, Faraday's Law must be understood as an empirical law that can only be confirmed through physical experimentation, such as altering magnetic flux in a conducting loop. The relationship between changing magnetic fields and induced electric fields is unique and cannot be reduced to the other equations. Overall, Maxwell's equations describe different aspects of electric and magnetic fields, making derivation among them unfeasible.
lugita15
Messages
1,553
Reaction score
15
Is it possible to derive Faraday's Law from the other three Maxwell equations plus the conservation of charge? If so, how?

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thank You in Advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Conservation of charge is not related to Faraday's law in any way, since Faraday's Law has absolutely nothing to do with charge. Faraday's law only talks about fields.

Faraday's Law cannot be derived from the other equations. If it could, it wouldn't be considered one of Maxwell's equations.
 
If you take the divergence of Maxwell's curl H equation, you get the continuity equation, which is equivalent to conservation of charge (if you use the div D equation). But you can't go the other way, although that is probably how Max deduced the D dot term.
 
You can go the other way, to some extent.
1. Start with the curl H equation with only the j term on the right.
2. Take the divergence of both sides.
3. This gives div j=0, but div j =-d rho/dt.
4. This requires adding the d D/dt term (using the div D Maxwell eq.) , which is equivalent to Farady's law.
 
Meir Achuz said:
You can go the other way, to some extent.
1. Start with the curl H equation with only the j term on the right.
2. Take the divergence of both sides.
3. This gives div j=0, but div j =-d rho/dt.
4. This requires adding the d D/dt term (using the div D Maxwell eq.) , which is equivalent to Farady's law.

How is that equivalent to Faraday's law? Faraday's law relates d B/dt to curl E, not d E/dt to curl B. Doesn't it? :confused:
 
My understanding is this: despite their mathematically rigorous statements, Maxwell's Equations are all empirical laws, meaning that they can't be derived by any axiomatic approach. As such, the only way to "derive" Faraday's Law would be to do a physical experiment and deduce it. In this case, you'd need to alter the magnetic flux of a conducting loop, and show that the line integral of the electric field (=the EMF) is equal to the rate of change of flux through the loop. But since each of Maxwell's equations say different things about the electric and magnetic fields, I can't think of a way in which you could derive any of them from the others.
 
Xezlec said:
How is that equivalent to Faraday's law? Faraday's law relates d B/dt to curl E, not d E/dt to curl B. Doesn't it? :confused:
Yes, I just got careless.
 
Back
Top