Question about Noether's Theorem.

AI Thread Summary
Noether's Theorem establishes a connection between symmetries in the Lagrangian and conservation laws, such as energy conservation linked to time translation and momentum conservation linked to space translation. The discussion highlights that while classical mechanics exhibits T-symmetry, which relates to time reversal, this symmetry does not yield a corresponding conservation law due to its classification as a discrete group of transformations. The theorem primarily addresses continuous transformations, making time reversal an exception. Therefore, no conserved quantity arises from time reversal in the context of Noether's Theorem. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for applying the theorem effectively in physics.
lugita15
Messages
1,553
Reaction score
15
According to Noether's Theorem, for every symmetry of the Lagrangian there is a corresponding conservation law. For instance, the invariance of the Lagrangian under time translation and space translation correspond to the conservation laws of energy and momentum, respectively. Also, the invariance of the Lagrangian under rotation in space corresponds to the conservation of angular momentum.

In classical mechanics at least, the laws of physics are also T-symmetric, i.e. they are symmetric with respect to time reversal. What is the corresponding conserved quantity, and how is it derived from the Lagrangian?

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thank You in Advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Noether's Theorem talks about continuous groups of transformations.

The time reversal is a discrete group^1 of transformations, thus it does not corresponds to any conservation law.


\hline

^1 Along with the identity transformation of course.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top