linux kid Messages 101 Reaction score 0 Thread starter Jan 17, 2007 #1 If there was a machine that claimed to have all the characteristics of such a machine and relied on gravity, can it be called a perpetual machine?
If there was a machine that claimed to have all the characteristics of such a machine and relied on gravity, can it be called a perpetual machine?
ranger Gold Member Messages 1,687 Reaction score 2 Jan 17, 2007 #2 Discussions about perpetual machines are not allowed on PF: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=151791
Discussions about perpetual machines are not allowed on PF: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=151791
linux kid Messages 101 Reaction score 0 Jan 17, 2007 #3 What is this some oil propaganda? I don't see why we can't discuss this topic. Why must we further limit our freedom, IMO this is pure nonsensical.
What is this some oil propaganda? I don't see why we can't discuss this topic. Why must we further limit our freedom, IMO this is pure nonsensical.
Evo Staff Emeritus Messages 24,114 Reaction score 3,277 Jan 17, 2007 #4 Perpetual motion machines don't exist and any discussion of one exceeds our limits on speculative posts, which is why they are not discussed here. If you had read the post ranger provided, you would understand why.
Perpetual motion machines don't exist and any discussion of one exceeds our limits on speculative posts, which is why they are not discussed here. If you had read the post ranger provided, you would understand why.