Question about Photoelectric Effect versus Compton Scattering.

  • Thread starter uart
  • Start date
  • #1
uart
Science Advisor
2,797
21
In the context of interaction of photons (with energies from around visible light and upwards) and the electrons of solid matter. I've read that at the lower energy levels that the photoelectric effect is more likely to occur during such an interaction and that Compton scattering is more likely for higher photon energies like x-rays. (.... and pair production at even higher energies).

I was just wondering why this is. Looking at it from a simplistic point of view I would have expected the opposite. That is, I would have expected that the higher energy photons would have been more likely to completely knock an electron out of the solid (PE effect) and that the lower energy photons would have been more likely to just make the electrons recoil as in Compton scattering.

Any simple explainations?
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
mathman
Science Advisor
7,984
513
The photoelectric effect involves the electron absorbing the photon. Compton scattering involves the photon giving up part of its energy to the electron, since it has too much energy to get absorbed.
 
  • #3
uart
Science Advisor
2,797
21
Thanks mathman, I guess I was wondering why the electron can't just absorb the higher energy photon and and get ejected at with more KE.

Anyway it's making more sense to me now. So I'm guessing it's momentum considerations that makes it unlikely for a higher energy photon to give up all it's energy. If a high energy photon were to give all of it's energy to an electron then the electron would end up with more momentum than the photon could provide, so the lattice would have to make up the difference. Does this sound correct?
 
  • #4
ZapperZ
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
Insights Author
35,977
4,683
Thanks mathman, I guess I was wondering why the electron can't just absorb the higher energy photon and and get ejected at with more KE.

Actually, it can, but there's a limit to this where, after a certain level, the increase will not be noticeable.

As you increase the photon energy, you not only can get electrons close to the Fermi energy, you also start to probe deeper into the band structure. So not only are you getting higher energy photoelectrons, but you're also getting more low-energy electrons coming from deeper in the band. However, at some point, you will no longer get any more significant photoelectrons because the penetration depth of the photon is now longer than the escape depth of the photoelectrons. This is especially true for metals where the electrons trying to escape the metal have a higher probability of losing its energy via collisions with other conduction electrons. So when the penetration depth is longer than the electrons' escape depth, you'll not get any more electrons.

Zz.
 
  • #5
1,938
50
In the context of interaction of photons (with energies from around visible light and upwards) and the electrons of solid matter. I've read that at the lower energy levels that the photoelectric effect is more likely to occur during such an interaction and that Compton scattering is more likely for higher photon energies like x-rays. (.... and pair production at even higher energies).

I was just wondering why this is. Looking at it from a simplistic point of view I would have expected the opposite. That is, I would have expected that the higher energy photons would have been more likely to completely knock an electron out of the solid (PE effect) and that the lower energy photons would have been more likely to just make the electrons recoil as in Compton scattering.

Any simple explainations?
About photoelectric effect ZapperZ answered you, about Compton scattering, think that only for X-rays the photon starts to have enough energy to do something to the electron; for a photon in the visible range, a collision with an electron is something like a baseball colliding with a truck.
 

Related Threads on Question about Photoelectric Effect versus Compton Scattering.

Replies
44
Views
10K
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
708
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
11K
Replies
18
Views
13K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
3K
Top