Understanding Photons: Query about v in Einstein's Equation | R.apaparioscios

  • Thread starter Thread starter Raparicio
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photons
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the interpretation of "v" in Einstein's equation related to Lorentz transformations, specifically questioning whether it represents a vector, its magnitude, or something more complex like a paravector. Participants clarify that "v" is typically understood as the magnitude of a velocity vector, specifically the speed of one frame of reference relative to another. Some suggest that alternative interpretations, such as paravectors or multivectors, could be considered if one were to change the foundational theories of Special and General Relativity. However, the prevailing view maintains that current theories successfully treat "v" as a scalar magnitude of a three-dimensional velocity vector. The conversation highlights the complexities of theoretical physics while affirming the established understanding of velocity in relativity.
Raparicio
Messages
115
Reaction score
0
Hello All,

I have a question about photons. In A. Einstein ecuation (about Lorenzt transformation), there's a square root of c^2-v^2. My question is about what is the v represented: a vector? Only one direction vector? Only his module?

best reggards.

R.apaparioscios.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you mean (1 - β^2)^1/2, where β = v/c? It's just the size of the velocity, so the modulus.
 
Ok

Nylex said:
Do you mean (1 - β^2)^1/2, where β = v/c? It's just the size of the velocity, so the modulus.

It's right. Is the modulus, but: could be a paravector?
 
What's a paravector? :confused:
 
Paravector

Hello now,

A paravector is a generalization of a vector, with a non-vectorial part and a vectorial part (like complex numbers have Real + Complex number). There are more generenalizations of vectors, like hypercomplex of hamilton, and the most general interesting now is Clifford Algebras and Geometric Algebra.

Could say that a vector is a paravector without escalar part in this example.

my best reggards.
 
You'd need a new theory for that.For the Theory of Relativity developed over the last exactly 100 years,that "v" from \beta or \gamma is a scalar,namely \left|\vec{v}\right|...That "v" has nothing to do with photons,of course...

Daniel.
 
Raparicio said:
Hello All,

I have a question about photons. In A. Einstein ecuation (about Lorenzt transformation), there's a square root of c^2-v^2. My question is about what is the v represented: a vector? Only one direction vector? Only his module?

best reggards.

R.apaparioscios.

the v is just an ordinary velocity-vector. It has three dimensions or equivalently it has three components, just like in the case of Lorentz transformations. That's all. The v² is the magnitude of this vector which is determined by calculating the scalar product of this vector with itself.

The v is the velocity of one frame of reference to another...
marlon
 
Paravector

marlon said:
the v is just an ordinary velocity-vector. It has three dimensions or equivalently it has three components, just like in the case of Lorentz transformations. That's all. The v² is the magnitude of this vector which is determined by calculating the scalar product of this vector with itself.

The v is the velocity of one frame of reference to another...
marlon

Could be the velocity, a paravector or multivector, and this 'v' its module?
 
It could iff u changed the whole theory.It could be pseudovector,the trace of a rank 658 tensor,etc...

Daniel.
 
  • #10
Whole theory?

dextercioby said:
It could iff u changed the whole theory.It could be pseudovector,the trace of a rank 658 tensor,etc...
Daniel.

Daniel,

What whole theory?
 
  • #11
Maybe he means SR, I dunno.
 
  • #12
Yeah,change SR,you'll need to change GR as well.For the time being,they are successful theories and these theories address the velocity in the "gamma-factor" as the modulus of an ordinary 3-vector...

Daniel.
 
  • #14
Meaning of SR and GR

dextercioby said:
Yeah,change SR,you'll need to change GR as well.For the time being,they are successful theories and these theories address the velocity in the "gamma-factor" as the modulus of an ordinary 3-vector...
Daniel.

I'm sorry for my ignorance. What means SR and GR?
 
  • #15
Special Relativity and General Relativity.


Daniel.
 
  • #16
Ok

dextercioby said:
Special Relativity and General Relativity.
Daniel.

Dear Daniel,

What I say is, what to unify SR an GR, we need to think the same way in both, and Geometrical Algebra provides a new tools to face it. If we take a multivector and apply a generalization of the Bertrand Russell circle, there are very interesting insights.

But this is very confusing to me.

Thanks another time.
 
Back
Top