Question about Planck's Law and temperature/light emission

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around Planck's Law, specifically its implications for light emission by objects at various temperatures, including human beings. Participants explore the nature of black body radiation, the spectrum of light emitted, and the visibility of such emissions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant initially misunderstood Planck's Law, believing it indicated that objects emit only a narrow wavelength of light, but later recognized that it describes a range of wavelengths with a peak emission.
  • Another participant notes that the human eye can only perceive visible light and mentions that all matter emits radiation, although the specifics of this radiation are unclear to them.
  • A later reply confirms that humans do emit visible light, but at very low intensities, suggesting that while it exists, it is not easily detectable.
  • One participant emphasizes that the Planck spectrum is based on idealized conditions of thermodynamic equilibrium and blackbody assumptions, which may not perfectly apply to real-world objects like humans.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and interpretation of Planck's Law and its implications. While there is some agreement on the emission of light by humans, the discussion includes differing views on the visibility and intensity of that light, as well as the applicability of Planck's Law to real-world scenarios.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations in their understanding of Planck's Law and the specifics of radiation emitted by matter, indicating a reliance on simplified models that may not fully capture the complexities involved.

lavadisco
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have a question about Planck's Law. When I first read about it, I misunderstood it to mean that an object at a certain temperature would only emit a very narrow wavelength of light. But as I've looked into it further it appears as though everything in the universe emits a range of light that looks like a bell curve, and Planck's Law only specifies the peak wavelength of a black body at a given temperature. Right?

Okay, so check out this graphic of black bodies of various temperatures (this is a pretty typical graphic used in black body description pages on the Internet):
[URL]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/19/Black_body.svg[/URL]

It would appear to imply that everything in the universe emits all wavelengths of light; that even the weakest parts of an object's spectrum are still not zero. If that's the case, then can I assume that human beings must emit visible light (in addition to their IR peak)? I know the retina is sensitive enough to respond to a single photon, but it appears that 5 - 9 photons are required within a 100ms or so to actually register a response in the brain. So are all the people around me giving off visible light that I'm not seeing?

If so, that's awesome. If not, what am I missing?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Science news on Phys.org
I'm not too familiar with Plancks law but I can address one of your questions. The human eye cannot see all spectrums of light only those spectrums that count as visible light those do do include gamma, xray etc. Also we cannot see frequency changes past 66 hertz I bleive is the correct value. A good example of this is to wave your hand rapidly in front of your eyes rabidly you won't see the full movment only points of that movment. TV makes excellent usage of this in animation.
Everything in nature does radiate as all matter has a half life I can't recall the correct form of that radiation however.
 
Mordred said:
I'm not too familiar with Plancks law but I can address one of your questions. The human eye cannot see all spectrums of light only those spectrums that count as visible light those do do include gamma, xray etc. Also we cannot see frequency changes past 66 hertz I bleive is the correct value. A good example of this is to wave your hand rapidly in front of your eyes rabidly you won't see the full movment only points of that movment. TV makes excellent usage of this in animation.
Everything in nature does radiate as all matter has a half life I can't recall the correct form of that radiation however.

Thanks Mordred, I'm already aware of everything you said. My understanding is that the peak emission of a typical human is in the infrared - but do we give off small quantities of visible light? And even more generally... does every object in the universe give off all frequencies of light, just at differing intensities?
 
lavadisco said:
So are all the people around me giving off visible light that I'm not seeing?

Yes, but it's incredibly dim. As in a couple of photons per day.
 
Also, the Planck spectrum is a kind of idealized emission, based on the assumptions of complete thermodynamic equilibrium (so a single temperature) and that the object is a "blackbody" (absorbs all light that impinges on it, and emission of light is just the inverse process to that). Neither of those are ever perfect assumptions, but they're often not too bad. More to the point, they represent such a huge simplification of a very difficult problem that we tend to squint our eyes and try to apply them even when they don't strictly apply, as for a human being.
 
Thanks guys. I think I'm going to really enjoy being a part of this forum.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 152 ·
6
Replies
152
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K