Question about point on a line?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cragar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Line Point
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of point correspondence between a line and a square, as presented in the book "one, two, three ... infinity." It explains that any point in a square can be represented by two coordinates, allowing for a one-to-one correspondence with points on a line. The conversation highlights the distinction between countably infinite sets, like natural numbers, and uncountably infinite sets, like real numbers, emphasizing that the latter cannot be matched one-to-one with naturals. Participants clarify that while pairs of numbers correspond to points in the plane, this does not imply a direct correspondence between the infinite sets themselves. The key takeaway is the understanding of different types of infinity and their implications for mathematical correspondence.
cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3
I was reading the book one, two , three ... infinity . And he says that their are the same amount of points on a line as their are in a square. A line from 0 to 1 and then a 1x1 square.
He says when can represent any point in that square with 2 numbers like coordinates. And if we add these numbers together then we can draw a one to one correspondence between the numbers in the square and the line. But then couldn't I just add all the reals from 0 to 1 and then 1 to 2 , and then put these into a one to one correspondence with the natural numbers.
Or does this not work because they are uncountably infinite.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
That is precisely the definition of "uncountably infinite"- that it cannot be put in one-to-one correspondence with the natural numbers. It can be shown that the rational numbers, between any two given numbers, are "countably infinite" (can be put in one-to-one correspondence with the natural numbers) but that the real numbers, between any two given number, and so the set of all points in an interval of the number line, is not.
 
so as long as what I am combining is countable then I can draw a one to one correspondence. But it kinda seems to me that in the book he is drawing a one to one correspondence between the set that has two numbers in it and a point. Not necessarily a one to one correspondence between the points themselves.
 
Last edited:
Two numbers will, of course, determine a point in the plane and so there is a one-to-one correspondence between pairs of numbers and points in the plane.
 
ok I can see that , Thanks for your response.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Back
Top