Question about PWM inverter output

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the operation and control of PWM (Pulse Width Modulation) inverters, focusing on the relationship between reference signals, output measurements, and error signals in feedback control systems. Participants explore concepts related to modulation signals, control loops, and the implications of using voltage and current sensors in PWM inverter design.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the amplitude of the PWM inverter output is influenced by the duration the sinusoidal modulating signal exceeds the carrier signal, questioning the logic behind error signal behavior in feedback control.
  • Another participant points out that the error signal can be both positive and negative, likening the described behavior to a negative feedback controller.
  • A further clarification is made regarding the error calculation, demonstrating that a negative error signal results in a decrease in output, countering the initial claim of continuous error increase.
  • Participants propose a modulation signal formula that incorporates both the reference and measured values.
  • There is a request for resources on controller design specific to PWM inverters, indicating a desire for more foundational understanding.
  • One participant emphasizes the connection between control theory and power electronics, suggesting that separating different concepts can aid understanding.
  • Questions arise about the necessity of having both current and voltage control loops in PWM inverters, with suggestions that controlling voltage may inherently control current.
  • A participant references a paper that supports their proposal of using only a voltage sensor, prompting further inquiry into the block diagram for such a system.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the behavior of error signals in feedback control, the necessity of multiple control loops, and the sufficiency of using only voltage or current sensors. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions regarding the behavior of error signals and the interactions between voltage and current control loops are not fully explored, leaving potential gaps in understanding. The discussion also reflects varying levels of familiarity with control theory and PWM inverter design.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in control systems, power electronics, and PWM inverter design may find this discussion relevant, particularly those seeking to understand feedback mechanisms and sensor applications in these contexts.

Dextrine
Messages
102
Reaction score
7
So, this is what I know so far, please correct me if I'm wrong.

The amplitude of the output of a PWM inverter depends on how long the sinusoidal modulating signal is greater than the carrier.

If you subtract the output (scaled down) from a reference signal in order to get some error and use this error as the modulating signal then having a reference higher than your measured output will create a larger modulating signal and it will bring you to around equilibrium... unless there's an overshootif at any point, your measured voltage is greater than your reference signal, the error will increase, thus increasing your measured output voltage thus further increasing the error.

I'm pretty sure I must be missing something here, but from what I can see, if your measured voltage is greater than your reference, your error will just increase forever. Where is my logic breaking down?

Thanks in advance.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Are you missing that the error signal can be plus or minus. Your description sounds like any genetic negative feedback controller.
 
Dextrine said:
If you subtract the output (scaled down) from a reference signal in order to get some error and use this error as the modulating signal then having a reference higher than your measured output will create a larger modulating signal and it will bring you to around equilibrium...

Try putting some numbers in...

Lets say the reference is 5V and the output 4V.
Subtract the output from the reference and you get 5-4 = 1V which is POSITIVE so the output will be increased. All fine so far..

if at any point, your measured voltage is greater than your reference signal, the error will increase, thus increasing your measured output voltage thus further increasing the error.

No that's incorrect.
Lets say the reference is still 5V but the output is 6V.
Subtract the output from the reference and you get 5-6 = -1V which is NEGATIVE so the output will be reduced not increased.
 
Modulation Signal = Reference + ( Reference - Measured).
 
Windadct said:
Modulation Signal = Reference + ( Reference - Measured).
What do you recommend reading to better understand controller design specifically for PWM inverters? So far, what I've found online seem to assume the reader to know a lot of details and I would like as in depth a description as I can get.
 
This is control theory - and it applies directly and cleanly to Power Electronics.

Wiki

Do not over-think it... when you try to consider it all at once then it is hard to separate the theory ( control) from the PWM concept, then from the code / microcontroller (the tool).
 
Thanks for the words of encouragement. This is definitely very interesting stuff though pretty hard.

So, I have some more questions I'm hoping someone can answer:

Why would you need a current control loop AND a voltage control loop in a PWM inverter? By controlling the voltage across the output filter (simple LC), aren't you by default controlling the current?

Why wouldn't you be able to just have a voltage output sensor, compare the value it reads with your reference, send that signal as your modulating signal which will change the PWM accordingly?

Or, why couldn't you do the same thing with just a current sensor since controlling the current across the capacitor will automatically be controlling the output voltage?
 
So it looks like you CAN do what I proposed, as is seen on this paper http://www.ijsr.net/archive/v3i8/MDIwMTU5MjE=.pdf

now, my question changes to, what would the block diagram for this look like, I keep getting that I will need to also know output current but in the picture the only sensor is output voltage.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
8K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
21K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K