Question about rational expressions and their domains

AI Thread Summary
Rational expressions are defined for real numbers where the algebraic expression is valid, excluding values that make the denominator zero. In the example given, the expression x² + 6x + 5/(x² - 25) simplifies to (x + 1)/(x - 5), but x cannot equal -5 because it leads to division by zero in the original expression. The equality holds only for values where both sides are defined, specifically for x ≠ ±5. Thus, x ≠ -5 is necessary to maintain the integrity of the original expression. Understanding these restrictions is crucial for correctly working with rational expressions.
Light Bearer
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Hi there. I am currently taking "College Math 1" at the local CC and I have encountered something that confuses me regarding rational expressions and their domains. The definition given by the textbook for rational expressions is:

"the set of real numbers for which an algebraic expression is defined is the domain of the expression. Because rational expressions indicate division and division by zero is undefined, we must exclude numbers from a rational expressions domain that make the denominator zero."

What I gather from that is that I am looking for any numbers that make the denominator zero? Say I have a simple rational expression such as x2 + 6x + 5/x2-25 and I am trying to simplify it. After factoring I get x2 + 6x/x2-25 --> (x+1)(x+5)/(x+5)(x-5) --> x+1/x-5, x != -5, x != 5. Using the definition from the textbook for rational expressions, I see how x=5 would be 5-5=0 which makes the expression undefined. My question is basically where does x != -5 come from? I only see why x != 5 because then the denominator would be zero.

Any answers are appreciated.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You seem to think that

\frac{(x+1)(x+5)}{(x-5)(x+5)} = \frac{x+1}{x-5}

This is a common mistake. But it is not true. Why not? If we set ##-5## in the left-hand side then it is not defined (because of division by 0). If we set ##-5## in the right-hand side, then we got something that is perfectly well-defined.

What is true is that the above equality holds for all values ##x## for which both sides are defined. So for all ##x## which are not ##\pm 5##, the equality holds. But in general, it does not hold.
 
It's called a missing solution. You can read about them here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extraneous_and_missing_solutions. Do you see that when you divide by x+5 there is the possibility that you are dividing by zero when x = -5? Since x^2-25 is a second degree equation you know there are two solutions or possible zeros that make the original equation undefined(5 and -5). Since -5 is not a solution to the second equation they are technically not equal.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top