Question about Renormalization Group Equation

Phileas.Fogg
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Hello,
in our lecture, we computed \beta^{\overline{MS}} , \gamma_m^{\overline{MS}} for - \frac{\lambda}{4!} \phi^4 Theory.

These are:

<br /> <br /> \beta^{\overline{MS}} (\lambda_{\overline{MS}}) = b_1 \lambda_{\overline{MS}}^2 + O(\lambda_{\overline{MS}}^3)

<br /> \gamma_m^{\overline{MS}} (\lambda_{\overline{MS}}) = d_1 \lambda_{\overline{MS}} + O(\lambda_{\overline{MS}}^2)<br />

Is there any change, if one goes to a - \frac{\lambda}{4!} \phi^2 Theory?

I think that the Lagrangian changes to:

L = \frac{1}{2} Z (\partial_{\mu} \phi_R)^2 - \frac{1}{2} m_0^2 Z \phi_R^2 - \frac{\lambda_0}{4!} Z \phi_R^2

But that has no effect on computing the beta- and gamma-function. Am I right?

Regards,
Mr. Fogg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A quadratic term like that is simply a mass term, with the mass played by the coefficient in front of the quadratic term. In the absence of interactions you would be dealing with a free theory, so all renormalization equations would turn out to be quite trivial.

The way to see it is to notice that the real mass term in the Lagrangian you wrote down is:

M^2\phi^2 = (\frac{1}{2}m_0^2Z-\frac{\lambda_0}{4!}Z)\phi^2

The coefficient for the \phi^4 is simply zero. But in the renormalization equations you wrote down there is no reference to the mass term, only to the interaction coupling constant. But that coefficient is zero...

Renormalization really only plays a role when you are dealing with interactions.
 
Hello,
thanks for your answer.

xepma said:
In the absence of interactions you would be dealing with a free theory, so all renormalization equations would turn out to be quite trivial.

So I compute the beta- and gamma-function in the same way, we did for phi^4 - Theory?

And the result is exactly the same like for phi^4-Theory?

Regards,
Mr. Fogg
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top