Question about reverse tracing the Einstein field equations

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
space-time
Messages
218
Reaction score
4
From what I know, to get the reverse trace form of the Einstein field equations, you must multiply both sides by gab (I didn't have a lot of time to make this thread so I did not spend time finding the Greek letters in the latex).

This turns:

Rab- [itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex]gabR= kTab (where k= (8[itex]\pi[/itex]G)/c4)

into this:

R- [itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex]R = kT

which equals:

[itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex]R = kT

which yields

R= 2kT= LT (I set L= 2k).

However, many sources say that the reverse trace is:

R= -LT

Why is it negative? Is it based on sign signature?

Note that I general, I use (- + + +) signature.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your problem is that ##g^{ab}g_{ab}=4## when you do the summation.
 
Last edited:
Nugatory said:
Your problem is that ##g^{ab}g_{ab}=4## when you do the summation.

So then this yields:

R-2R= kT

which equals

-R = kT

which yields:

R = -kT

I presume that this is the correct process. Is this what you are getting at? If so then I get it now. Thank you.
 
space-time said:
So then this yields:

R-2R= kT

which equals

-R = kT

which yields:

R = -kT

I presume that this is the correct process. Is this what you are getting at? If so then I get it now. Thank you.

It looks right. I think Baez has some lecture notes that do the derivation online that go through this, if you haven't seen them already (I suspect it could be your source).