Question about the force of a falling object.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the shock load on an anchor point during a fall when using a fall arrest harness without a shock absorber. The key factors include the weight of the individual, the length of the lanyard, and the deceleration distance upon arresting the fall. It is emphasized that without a shock absorber, the forces generated during a fall can be significantly high, potentially exceeding the strength of the lanyard and leading to further falls. The importance of deceleration time in calculations is highlighted, along with the need for compliance with national safety standards and adequate fall clearance. Overall, using a shock-absorbing lanyard is strongly recommended for safety.
PCruise
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm a theatrical lighting designer wear a fall arrest harness while climbing in trussing.
I can't find a calculation method for determining the weight put on the anchor point in the event of a fall.

I weight 160 lbs. my lanyard is 6 feet long. It has no shock absorber so I would come to a very sudden and complete stop.

Is there a method of calculating the weight of the shock load of arresting my fall?

Thanks,
Cruise
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry Cruise, I realized my first response was not an answer to the question you were asking. I said that the force that the ceiling anchor point puts on you is equal and opposite to the constant force of your weight. This is true, but only after you were hanging at rest.

Impact usually requires us to know how fast your change in velocity was, or how long it took you to come to a stop. Everything is actually a bit of a spring, elastic and soft.

FredGarvin said:
Impact equations are not an easy thing to figure out. The defining factor is how long does it take the object to come to a complete rest once it hits the stationary object. In theory you can treat it as a perfectly elastic collision and use momentum and go about your merry way. Real life does not involve perfectly elastic collisions. There is a finite, however usually quite large deceleration of the object when it hits the ground. It will all depend on how much of a distance the object is going to decelerate. The longer the distance, the less the deceleration and thus the less the force that is a result.

If you were to drop something on to a hard surface that was instrumented with an accelerometer, you would see that the peak acceleration will be much more that of gravity. That is the real force experienced in the drop. The curve would show you the impulse the object sees. Impulse is what you need to look into.

If the time it took you to stop was 0 seconds, that would lead to a calculation of infinite shock.

Welcome to PF!
 
Last edited:
The maths behind this type of calculation is very complex, way beyond me. But for practical purposes it can be simplified to:
- the weight of the object (you and your gear)
- multiplied by the acceleration distance (your free-fall) and then
- divided by the deceleration distance (arrest distance)

Arrest Force = Weight x Free-Fall Distance/ Arrest Distance

Basically if you try arrest a fall without a shock absorber decelerating you gradually you will generate very high forces. Easily enough to break your lanyard... then you will just keep falling, regardless of anchor point strength. Generally this is considered as "not good". So get a shock absorber before you do anything!

Also, you should ensure that any anchor point you design complies with your relevant national standards. Also please ensure you have sufficient fall clearance to fall into.
 
Thank you, MK.
I didn't realize how essential the deceleration time is for the equation.
Which would be information I'd have to get from a rigging company, I suppose.

Thank you as well John.
I'm not concerned about the Lanyard breaking.
The harness and lanyard are manufactured by SAPSIS rigging for this purpose.
but you're correct about the fall clearance.
I'm working at 15-35' hieghts, which is why I didn't purchase the Shock Absorbtion lanyard. (it would add too much length for the necessary safety clearance)

Thanks agian!
Cruise
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top