B Question about the nature of Gravitation

AI Thread Summary
Gravitation is explained through General Relativity as the curvature of space-time and through Quantum Field Theory as mediated by the hypothetical graviton. The discussion centers on whether gravitation exhibits wave-particle duality. It is concluded that gravitation itself does not obey this duality, similar to the electric force, while the graviton, if it exists, would have a wavefunction and thus could exhibit duality. The distinction is made that wave-particle duality pertains to particles like electrons and photons, not forces. The conversation emphasizes the theoretical nature of gravitons and their implications for physics if detected.
Swapnil Das
Messages
15
Reaction score
6
Hello.

Modern Physics explains Gravitation in two general ways:
  • In accordance to the General Theory of Relativity, Gravitation is thought of as an effect of the curvature of space-time continuum. This results in the formation of the recently and famously detected Gravitational Waves.
  • Quantum Field Theory explains Gravitation to be mediated by a hypothetical particle called the graviton.
So can we say that even Gravitation obeys wave particle duality? Please express your views.

Thanks!

Swapnil
 
Space news on Phys.org
Swapnil Das said:
So can we say that even Gravitation obeys wave particle duality?

No. Gravitation is like the electric force. An electron or photon obeys the wave-particle duality, but the electric force does not. Gravitons, if they exist, would obey the same duality, but gravitation would not.
 
  • Like
Likes Swapnil Das
Drakkith said:
No. Gravitation is like the electric force. An electron or photon obeys the wave-particle duality, but the electric force does not. Gravitons, if they exist, would obey the same duality, but gravitation would not.
Thanks for your valuable reply!
 
The wave-particle duality is a property of a wavefunction, not of a force. A graviton is a perturbation of a vacuum and has a certain wavefunction in the quantum formalism. Hence it will obey the wave-particle duality.

Btw, see chapter 2 of this paper,

http://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0609163.pdf

by one of our PF-users, for a clear explanation of the duality.
 
Gravitons have not been detected, although if they were that would certainly upset a few apple carts.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top