Question about the notation in Quantum Physics

princeton118
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Does the \langle \phi \rangle means \langle0|\phi|0\rangle?
What does |\phi| exactly mean?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
<B> means <y|B|y> where y is some given wavefunction.

I'd guess your other one should have a square in it in which case it would mean modulys squared or in other words the complex conjugate of phi times phi
 
princeton118 said:
Does the \langle \phi \rangle means \langle0|\phi|0\rangle?
What does |\phi| exactly mean?

I think that probably all the notations you used mean different things:

DIRAC NOTATIONS:

1.|psi> is a ket that lives in a hilbert space, math speaking is a state vector which belongs to a projective hilbert space, ie it is a ray.

2.If the hilbert space is separable, you get the complet. relation---> Sum|n><n|=1;
u can have also generalized basis such as the deltas for x and plane waves for p, and the Sum become an integral.

3.a.You have also <x|x'>=delta(x-x')
3.b. or for a separable basis <n|n'>=delta_nn' (the last delta is a kronecker one).

4.Importamt <x|psi>=psi(x) and it is a complex function psi:R^3----->C
the wave function!

Now you can get the meaning of |psi|= the modulus of the wave function, while for the first notation <phi>=<0|phi|0> you have 2 choices i think:

a) it is a second quantization formalism, which mean the vacuum expactation value of a field.

b)Or, if phi is an observable (P,H,L...), it can be the average over the ground state...

ususally when you start reading a book the conventions are displayed..


hope that helped..

marco
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top