Question based on a video (battery and voltage)

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter gracy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Video Voltage
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
50 replies · 4K views
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, I hadn't watched the 3rd case earlier. I thought Vx and Vy would be voltages across the capacitors. Then I watched the video and saw that they are two points. What I actually wanted to say is Vc1 has to be equal to Vc2. Sorry!
 
gracy said:
From time 7:22 to 7:32 he says if we take ##Q_1##>##Q_2## then ##V_x## >##V_y##

This is for initial condition, right? Because finally it does not matter whether ##Q_1## is greater or ##Q_2## , final potential at x will always be greater than final potential at y. Right?
 
gracy said:
This is for initial condition, right? Because finally it does not matter whether ##Q_1## is greater or ##Q_2## , final potential at x will always be greater than final potential at y. Right?
If Q1 is greater, voltage polarity of C1 will not change in the end.
Screenshot_2016-02-13-14-31-33.png
Screenshot_2016-02-13-14-31-51.png
 
Last edited:
cnh1995 said:
I think so. If Q1 is greater, voltage polarity of C1 will not change in the end.
And even if Q1 isn't greater final potential at x will still be greater than final potential at y. Right?
 
What are these pictures about?
 
gracy said:
And even if Q1 isn't greater final potential at x will still be greater than final potential at y. Right?
I don't think so. If Q1 is greater, then only Vxf>Vyf. You can see it here.
Screenshot_2016-02-13-14-43-29.png
Screenshot_2016-02-13-14-43-38.png
 
Last edited:
##q_{1f}## + ##q_{2f}## =##Q_{1f}## - ##Q_{2f}##

If ##Q_{1f}## < ##Q_{2f}##

It means ##q_{1f}## < ##q_{2f}##

But it does not tell much about polarity of ##q_{1f}##.
 
gracy said:
##q_{1f}## + ##q_{2f}## =##Q_{1f}## - ##Q_{2f}##

If ##Q_{1f}## < ##Q_{2f}##

It means ##q_{1f}## < ##q_{2f}##

But it does not tell much about polarity of ##q_{1f}##.
See #37. The polarity of 10uF has changed. If Q1 is more, it will retain its polarity.
 
If Q1 is greater, Vxf>Vyf. In #37, Q1(charge on 10uF)is less than Q2(charge on 5uF). Hence, polarity of C1(10uF) changed, making Vxf<Vyf.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SammyS
I am unable to comprehend those pictures in post #37.
 
cnh1995 said:
eater, Vxf>Vyf. In #37, Q1(charge on 10uF)is less than Q2(charge on 5uF). Hence, polarity of C1(10uF) changed, making Vxf<Vyf.

How one Can prove it ? I mean besides experimentally.
 
gracy said:
There will be potential difference between points x and y given by (Q1−Q2)/(C1+C2)
If Q1<Q2, Vxy will be negative i.e Vx<Vy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy
gracy said:
I am unable to comprehend those pictures in post #37.
It is a simulation result. It is an example of the case 3 in that video. In that circuit, Q1(charge on 10uF) is less than Q2(charge on 5uF) but initially Vx>Vy. When the middle switch is closed, it becomes the case 3. You can see the polarity of the 10uF reversed in the steady state, making Vx<Vy.
 
Last edited:
Can you give me link to that simulation site?
 
gracy,

When you said the following (way) back in Post #30,
gracy said:
There will be potential different between points x and y given by ##\frac{Q1-Q2}{C1+C2}##
Right?
I thought it was clear to you as to why Vx > Vy . ##\ ## After all, Vx − Vy = (Q1 − Q2)/(C1 + C2) .
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy
I thought this formula is for potential difference and it is not particularly ##V_x## - ##V_y## rather ##V_+## - ##V_-##. I know it's bit odd but that's what I thought.
 
When I thought it is ##V_+## - ##V_-##

By ##V_+## I mean potential at either x or y whichever is at greater (positive potential ).

(##Q_1## - ##Q_2##)/(##C_1## + ##C_2## )This formula just gives potential difference and does not specify anything about which point is at greater potential.This is what I thought.

I wrote there will be potential different between points x and y given by (##Q_1## - ##Q_2##)/(##C_1## + ##C_2## ) because at that time I knew x is at greater potential.
 
gracy said:
When I thought it is ##V_+## - ##V_-##

By ##V_+## I mean potential at either x or y whichever is at greater (positive potential ).

(##Q_1## - ##Q_2##)/(##C_1## + ##C_2## )This formula just gives potential difference and does not specify anything about which point is at greater potential.This is what thought.
First, think.

The above formula does specify which is at higher potential.
If ##\ Q_1< Q_2 \,,\ ## then ##\ Q_1- Q_2 \ ## and ##\ V_x- V_y \ ## are negative meaning Vy becomes the V+.

I wrote there will be potential different between points x and y given by (##Q_1## - ##Q_2##)/(##C_1## + ##C_2## ) because at that time I knew x is at greater potential.