Question: Can Gravity Accelerate Beyond the Speed of Light?

  • Thread starter Thread starter matt_dabbs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
matt_dabbs
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm sure that someone has already asked this question, but I can't find an answer for it, so here goes. If I sound like an idiot...well, whatever. :smile:

If gravity is an acceleration (10 meters per second per second, etc.), then, if you "fell" far enough, would you eventually accelerate beyond c? If you can't, does that mean that the acceleration becomes nothing at c? And if so, doesn't that mean there is no gravity at c (because there is no acceleration), which wouldnt' work because then light wouldn't be affected by gravity, would it? If that was the case, is it possible that light itself isn't actually traveling at quite c?

Sorry if this is a bit convoluted, and I'm sure its a simple answer, but it's driving me crazy. Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The acceleration relative to you, would always be the same. Relative to some fixed outside frame the acceleration would taper off as you got close to c.
 
The question has an interesting facit - if you were accelerated by some constant external force other than a G field, as you approached the velocity of light your effective inertia would increase so that your acceleration would asympotically wane to zero. But in a G field, as your inertia increases, so does the attractive force due to the increased mass (according to Einstein). So things become undefined since at c,
a = F/m = infinity/infinity
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
42
Views
684
Replies
105
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
30
Views
4K
Back
Top