Question: can we make wind during motion

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ghostinthemachine
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion Wind
AI Thread Summary
Moving your hand faster over a longer distance generates more airflow because it displaces a greater volume of air. In contrast, when the hand moves quickly over a shorter distance, the volume of air moved is minimal, resulting in less noticeable airflow. The distinction between creating "wind" and merely causing air disturbance is not a strict physics issue, as both actions involve air movement. The surprising aspect lies in the relationship between distance, speed, and the amount of air displaced. Ultimately, hand motion can indeed create airflow, but the effectiveness varies with the distance covered.
Ghostinthemachine
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Why when I move my hand faster to long distance and apply force I get more air but when I move my hand fast to shorter distance I barely get any air
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ghostinthemachine said:
Why when I move my hand faster to long distance and apply force I get more air but when I move my hand fast to shorter distance I barely get any air
The shorter the distance, the less air you move, because the volume passed by the hand is smaller.
 
Ghostinthemachine said:
Why when I move my hand faster to long distance and apply force I get more air but when I move my hand fast to shorter distance I barely get any air
And this is surprising, why exactly?
 
phinds said:
And this is surprising, why exactly?

Maybe @Ghostinthemachine you could describe what you think should happen.
 
can we make wind during motion for example when I move my hands or it’s just wind disturbance and wind that is already there?

[Mentor Note -- Multiple thread starts on the same question have been merged]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You can move air. Whether to call that ”wind” or not isn’t a physics question.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top