Question concerning the expected position of an object

Ryuzaki
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
Suppose there's an object within a sphere of radius 5-metres from a given point P=(x_0,y_0,z_0). The probabilities of the object being within 0-1, 1-2, 2-3, 3-4 and 4-5 metres of P are given to be respectively p_1,p_2,p_3,p_4 and p_5. With this information, is it possible to find the expected position of the object,i.e, its expected coordinates?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You would have to make a specific assumption about the probability distribution of the object within each of those "shells".
If you assume a distribution that is spherically symmetric about (0,0,0) in each shell, the expected coordinates of the object will be (0,0,0).
 
What kind of an assumption do I need? Could you give an example? Also, if P = (0,0,0), how do you get the expected coordinates of the object to be (0,0,0)? Doesn't it depend on the values of the probabilities of the object being within each shell?
 
Ryuzaki said:
What kind of an assumption do I need? Could you give an example?
Compute the volume v_i of each shell i = 1,2,3,4,5 and set the probability density function for the object within that shell to be p_i/v_i.

Also, if P = (0,0,0), how do you get the expected coordinates of the object to be (0,0,0)?

The expected value is (0,0,0) if the probability distributions are spherically symmetric. Think about a probability distribution on a line. If it is symmetric about x = 0 then the mean value of the distribution must be x = 0.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top