[QUESTION]Dark energy could it be an explosion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Harry Gillman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Explosion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the concept of dark energy and whether it could be explained as an explosion causing a shockwave that accelerates the universe's expansion. Participants clarify that dark energy is not a localized phenomenon like an explosion but rather a pervasive energy field that contributes to the universe's accelerated expansion. The cosmological constant, associated with dark energy, is described as a repulsive force, contradicting the idea of slowing down. Einstein's initial introduction of the cosmological constant is acknowledged, but it is emphasized that he did not debunk its relevance. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of dark energy and encourages further study on the topic.
Harry Gillman
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I don't really know about theories on dark energy, but could "it" be an explosion and the shockwave causing the increase in the rate the universe is expanding at?
Or have there already been studies on it?

Thanks, Harry. :)
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The shockwave from an explosion really is like a pulse of energy that travels through the air where the explosion is taking place. The accelerated expansion of the universe is not a localized pulse and does not dissipate like an explosion does.
 
Harry Gillman said:
I don't really know about theories on dark energy, but could "it" be an explosion and the shockwave causing the increase in the rate the universe is expanding at?
Or have there already been studies on it?

Thanks, Harry. :)

From what we know dark energy could be a kind of dynamical energy field/fluid which inhibits space and causes the apparent unusual expansion of the universe instead of the slowing down due to its repulsive effect (cosmological constant) ,Einstein had made a mention of it initially but then debunked it as his biggest blunder.

Regards,
ibysaiyan
 
Hi Harry, welcome to PF!
Harry Gillman said:
I don't really know about theories on dark energy, but could "it" be an explosion and the shockwave causing the increase in the rate the universe is expanding at?
The best way to learn about a topic is to do some basic reading on it, and then try to ask more specific questions. Try starting withhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy" .
There are lots of reasons why what you're proposing doesn't quite fit; that article should point to some of them. If there are any specific questions you have, ask away!

ibysaiyan said:
From what we know dark energy could be a kind of dynamical energy field/fluid which inhibits space and causes the apparent unusual expansion of the universe instead of the slowing down due to its repulsive effect (cosmological constant) ,Einstein had made a mention of it initially but then debunked it as his biggest blunder.
This is an incredibly confusing and inaccurate response.
Dynamic: It is ambiguous what you mean by 'dynamical', but in many respects dark energy is one of the least 'dynamic' things in the universe.
Inhibits space: what is that supposed to mean?
slowing down due to its repulsive effect (cosmological constant): The 'repulsion' is what leads to accelerated expansion, not slowing down. The expansion of the universe is accelerating. And the 'cosmological constant' is another way of describing 'dark energy', they aren't altogether separate concepts.
Einstein: Einstein did not 'debunk' the cosmological constant. The famous quote and story is in regards to his methodology and the reasoning behind his actions, not the constant itself---which we believe to be effectively correct.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Harry Gillman said:
I don't really know about theories on dark energy, but could "it" be an explosion and the shockwave causing the increase in the rate the universe is expanding at?

Probably not.

One of the things that appears to be true about the universe is that it is more or less homogenous and isotropic. What that means is that one part of the universe is pretty much the same as some other part of the universe.

Blast waves aren't homogenous or isotropic.
 
zhermes said:
Hi Harry, welcome to PF!
The best way to learn about a topic is to do some basic reading on it, and then try to ask more specific questions. Try starting withhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy" .
There are lots of reasons why what you're proposing doesn't quite fit; that article should point to some of them. If there are any specific questions you have, ask away!This is an incredibly confusing and inaccurate response.
Dynamic: It is ambiguous what you mean by 'dynamical', but in many respects dark energy is one of the least 'dynamic' things in the universe.
Inhibits space: what is that supposed to mean?
slowing down due to its repulsive effect (cosmological constant): The 'repulsion' is what leads to accelerated expansion, not slowing down. The expansion of the universe is accelerating. And the 'cosmological constant' is another way of describing 'dark energy', they aren't altogether separate concepts.
Einstein: Einstein did not 'debunk' the cosmological constant. The famous quote and story is in regards to his methodology and the reasoning behind his actions, not the constant itself---which we believe to be effectively correct.
Thanks for the correction ,my response may have been immature considering I have yet to start my degree but this is why I am on this forum although I have made it clear that it's the repulsion which is causing acceleration .I am also aware of the difference between cosmological constant which was brought up by Einstein due to his belief in a static universe until Hubble's discovery.

Regards,
ibysaiyan
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top