Question involving the conservation of momentum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the conservation of momentum in a system involving a gun and a shell. It emphasizes that the momentum of the gun-shell system must remain constant before and after firing, assuming no external forces act on it. A key point raised is the need to account for the relative velocities of the shell and gun when applying conservation principles. Participants suggest formulating equations that relate the momentum of the shell to that of the gun while considering their velocities relative to the ground. The conversation concludes with a reminder to incorporate the effects of the expelled gases and the correct reference frames in the calculations.
Mason Smith
Messages
21
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


upload_2019-2-14_12-32-22.png


Homework Equations


The conservation of momentum states that if there are no external forces acting on a system, then momentum is conserved (i.e., the momentum before an event is equal to the momentum after an event). (Note: We assume that the internal forces follow Newton's third law (i.e., forces are third law pairs) and that the sum of the internal forces is equal to zero.)

The Attempt at a Solution


If we are trying to solve for the speed of the shell relative to the ground, then we should consider only the shell moving while the gun is stationary. Therefore, the speed of the shell relative to the ground, and thus the momentum of the shell relative to the ground, will include a factor of the momentum of the gun. This is the approach that I think makes most sense. However, I am stuck. Can someone provide insight?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2019-2-14_12-32-22.png
    upload_2019-2-14_12-32-22.png
    10.9 KB · Views: 663
Physics news on Phys.org
Mason Smith said:
then we should consider only the shell moving while the gun is stationary.
No, this is incorrect. It would violate conservation of momentum. The momentum in the gun-bullet system after the firing must be the same as before since there are no forces from the ground. You need to dress these words in equations along with the requirement that the velocity of the bullet relative to the gun is v.
 
Mason Smith said:

Homework Statement



The Attempt at a Solution


If we are trying to solve for the speed of the shell relative to the ground, then we should consider only the shell moving while the gun is stationary. Therefore, the speed of the shell relative to the ground, and thus the momentum of the shell relative to the ground, will include a factor of the momentum of the gun. This is the approach that I think makes most sense. However, I am stuck. Can someone provide insight?
What is missing here is the fact that the gases expelled from the muzzle at high speed carry momentum. It looks like you are supposed to ignore that and assume that the momentum of the shell + momentum of the gun after the shell leaves the muzzle will sum to the momentum of the gun before firing, all relative to the ground (i.e. 0).

This must be a large artillery gun as it is firing shells (which explode). Normally artillery guns are fired up into the air so you are also supposed to ignore the force of the gun recoil on the earth.

(1) Set up the equation that relates the momentum of the shell to the momentum of the gun as the shell leaves the muzzle, assuming the momentum of the muzzle gases is negligible. (ie. it would be the same as if the shell was launched by a spring inside the gun).

(2) Then express the relative velocity of the shell to gun (vsg) in terms of the velocities of the gun relative to the Earth (vge) and of the shell to the Earth (vse)

(3) Substitute the value of (vge) in (2) into your equation in (1) and solve for vse

AM
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Mason Smith
What Andrew said..

The trick with this problem is that before firing the velocity of the gun and bullet are specified relative to the ground. Whereas after firing the velocity of the bullet has been specified relative to the gun not the ground. You just need to write your conservation of momentum equations relative to the ground and then adjust them for this difference.
 
  • Like
Likes Mason Smith
Alternatively you could "reverse time" the 'firing event' (explosion) which would yield a perfectly inelastic collision. Collision impulse is then μΔv where Δv is the relative velocity and μ is the reduced mass ##\frac{m_1m_2}{m_1+m_2}## of the colliding objects - which both come to rest relative to the ground. Now you know the change in momentum, just divide by mass of bullet.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top