Question on a Spaceship Drive -- changing acceleration is called what?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the terminology used to describe the rate of change in acceleration, specifically when increasing from 1G to 2G. The term "jerk" is identified as the correct term for this rate of change in acceleration. Participants also mention higher derivatives of motion, humorously referred to as "snap, crackle, and pop," which are less commonly used in practical physics. The conversation highlights the playful nature of physics terminology and the unexpected names that can arise in the field. Overall, the thread provides clarity on the terminology related to changing acceleration in propulsion systems.
ckirmser
Messages
105
Reaction score
3
I couldn't find a relevant forum - that I could recognize, anyway - so, if this is in the wrong place, please feel free to move it to a more appropriate forum.

Ennywho, I have a question on terms.

Let's say there's a space probe's propulsion system that is currently providing an acceleration of 1G and it is being increased to 2G. The process of changing from a 1G acceleration to 2G takes, say, two minutes.

What is that rate of change from 1G to 2G called? Is there even a term for it? Are there any related formulas? Does it have something to do with specific impulse or any of the other common propulsion terms or procedures?

Thanx in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Omigawd, I'd've never even thought of that term. I would've thought something a bit more - well, scholastic like "Oppenhoofer's Second Law of Dynamic Motion" with the term called "emphatic impulse," or something.

But, thanx, A.T., just what I was looking for.
 
The higher in derivative you go, the less this is used in real physics and the more it is used to win bar bets.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top