Question on correctly interpreting a bra-ket equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on interpreting the bra-ket equation for uncertainty in energy, specifically the term ##(\hat H - \bar E )^2##. It is clarified that this expression can indeed be expanded using binomial expansion, leading to ##\hat H^2 - 2 \bar E \hat H + \bar E^2##, which can be distributed over the state ##|\Phi \rangle##. Additionally, it is confirmed that for an operator ##\hat{H}## acting on its eigenvector, the relation ##\hat H^2 \psi = E^2 \psi## holds true. The user expresses gratitude for the clarification, indicating they can proceed with their calculations. Understanding these notations is crucial for solving quantum mechanics problems related to energy uncertainty.
blaisem
Messages
28
Reaction score
2
I am trying to solve for the uncertainty in energy ##\Delta E## in the following exercise:
$$\Delta E = \sqrt{\langle \Phi | (\hat H - \bar E )^2 | \Phi \rangle}$$
Questions
  1. What does ##(\hat H - \bar E )^2## mean? Is it a simple binomial expansion into ##\hat H^2 - 2 \bar E \hat H + \bar E^2##, which I distribute over ##|\Phi \rangle##?
  2. If that is the case, does ##\hat H^2 \psi = E^2 \psi##?

I'm not inquiring for the full solution. I simply do not understand the notation in order to begin.

Background
In case a broader context is important, here is the full info available to me:
$$\begin{align} \Phi = a_1 \psi _1 &+ a_2 \psi _2 + a_3 \psi _3 \nonumber \\ \hat H &\psi _i = E_i \psi _i \nonumber \\ \langle \psi _i &| \psi _j \rangle = \delta _{ij} \nonumber \end{align}$$
I also normalized ##\Phi## as ##N=\left( \sum_{1}^3 a_{i}^2 \right)^{-1/2}## and solved ##\bar E = \langle \Phi | \hat H | \Phi \rangle = N^2 \sum_i \left( a_i^2 E_i \right) ## in previous exercises.

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. Yes
2. Consider an operator ##\hat{A}## with an eigenvector-eigenvalue pair ##v, A##. Then ##\hat{A}^{2}v = \hat{A}(\hat{A}\psi) = \hat{A}(Av) = A(\hat{A}v) = A^{2}v##
 
  • Like
Likes blaisem
Perfect! I should be good from here on out. Thanks for the help getting started.
 
  • Like
Likes GwtBc
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top