Question on Cosmological Constant paper

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the behavior of a sum in the context of a cosmological constant paper, specifically analyzing equation (193) as time approaches infinity. By substituting t with (1-iε)s, the sum simplifies to highlight the rapid oscillation of the first term while the remaining terms diminish to zero. The key point is that the term with the smallest energy, E_0, dominates the sum as s approaches infinity. Consequently, the leading order behavior is determined by this E_0-term, which decreases more slowly than the others. This analysis clarifies the conditions under which the terms in the equation behave as described by the author.
zaybu
Messages
53
Reaction score
2
In the paper, http://arxiv.org/pdf/1205.3365v1.pdf, page 21, the author argues that if:
t →∞(1-iϵ), all the terms in equation (193) goes to zero, except the first term.

Can anyone explain this to me?

Thanks
 
Space news on Phys.org
Well, it's pretty simple I think. Suppose you have a sum
S = \sum_n \exp(-i E_n t). Let t = (1-i \epsilon) s where s is real. Then S = \sum_n \exp(-i E_n s) \exp(-E_n s). Now you want to evaluate this sum when s \rightarrow \infty. In that limit, the first term oscillates rapidly and the second term of the sum goes to zero.

The dominating component of the sum is the one that goes to zero the slowest. If we order the E:s so that E_0 < E_1 < E_2 < ..., then the leading order behaviour is given by the E_0-term as the rest go to zero even faster than that one.
 
Thanks
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?
Back
Top