Question on definition of Lie groups

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the definition of Lie groups, specifically focusing on the set of linear functions that preserve the inner product in R². Participants explore the requirements for this set to be classified as a Lie group, particularly the need for it to be a smooth manifold and the implications of parametrization on this classification.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how to prove that the set G is a smooth manifold without specifying a parametrization, suggesting that the definition may depend on the chosen parametrization.
  • Another participant proposes using continuity and smoothness properties of the inner product along with assumptions for functions f and g to ensure the manifold structure.
  • A participant expresses uncertainty about alternative strategies, noting that associating functions with elements of a vector space for differentiation is dependent on the parametrization, which may not be differentiable.
  • There is a suggestion that a theorem might exist stating that proving differentiability for one parametrization could imply differentiability for the non-parametrized set.
  • One participant mentions the need for a topological argument, indicating a lack of depth in topology knowledge but recognizing that R² has known topological results that might preserve smoothness properties.
  • A later reply identifies the group in question as the orthogonal group, which is a well-known Lie group, and suggests that using matrix representations could facilitate discussions about topology.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty and explore various strategies without reaching a consensus on the best approach to establish G as a Lie group. Multiple competing views on the role of parametrization and topology are present.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations regarding the dependence on parametrization and the need for further exploration of topological properties to support their arguments.

mnb96
Messages
711
Reaction score
5
Hello,

I have a doubt on the definition of Lie groups that I would like to clarify.
Let's have the set of functions [tex]G=\{ f:R^2 \rightarrow R^2 \; | \; < f(x),f(y)>=<x,y> \: \forall x,y \in R^2 \}[/tex], that is the set of all linear functions ℝ2→ℝ2 that preserve the inner product. Let's associate the operation of composition to the elements of G and we obtain a group [itex](G,\circ)[/itex].

Now in order to say that G is indeed a Lie group we must prove that G is also a smooth manifold. How can I do this if we don't specify a parametrization (e.g. a matrix representation) for the group G ?

And also in that case, wouldn't the definition of G being a smooth manifold depend on the parametrization?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you use continuity and smoothness properties of the inner product and also use some assumptions for f and g to ensure this?
 
I don't know. To be honest I cannot come up with other different strategies than associating each function [itex]f\in G[/itex] with an element of a vector space where I could perform ordinary partial differentiation w.r.t. to the parameters. But this approach is then dependent on the parametrization that I give, which may or may not be differentiable.

Perhaps there might be some theorem that states that if we are able to find just one parametrization by which we manage to prove that the "parametrized G" is a differentiable manifold, then also our "non-parametrized G" must be a differentiable manifold?
 
mnb96 said:
I don't know. To be honest I cannot come up with other different strategies than associating each function [itex]f\in G[/itex] with an element of a vector space where I could perform ordinary partial differentiation w.r.t. to the parameters. But this approach is then dependent on the parametrization that I give, which may or may not be differentiable.

Perhaps there might be some theorem that states that if we are able to find just one parametrization by which we manage to prove that the "parametrized G" is a differentiable manifold, then also our "non-parametrized G" must be a differentiable manifold?

It sounds like you need some topological argument since you are talking about a general continuity property rather than some specific one (like a specific parameterization). I don't really know any topology though in depth so I'm not even aware of the major theorems.

R^2 I'm sure (as for R^n) has known topological results: can you assume that the topology is the same or at least something that keeps the smoothness properties in tact?
 
Sorry, I need to go now, but maybe try using the fact that the group you described

is usually called the orthogonal group--consisting of the elements that preserve

a given quadratic form Q* -- and it is a well-known Lie group. * Remember that your inner-product can be described thru a quadratic form.
The answer

to your question, tho, may have to see with using matrices in a representation of

the group. A group representation of a group G is just a homomorphism between

G and a group of matrices, so that each g in G is assigned a matrix. Once you have

a matrix, you can start talking about a topology . Just use the subspace topology

in R^{n^2} , where you assign to a matrix an n^2-ple (a11, a12,..., ann ).

See, e.g:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orthogonal_group
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K