Question on Dirichlet problem in cylinder with radial symmetry.

yungman
Messages
5,741
Reaction score
294
This is not homework.

I have problem deriving the solution for cylinder with radial symmetry given:

\nabla^2U(\rho,z)=R''+\frac{1}{\rho}R'+\frac{Z''}{Z}=0

Which give \rho^2 R''+ \rho R' -k\rho^2 R=0 \hbox { and } Z''+kZ=0

With given boundary conditions U(\rho,0) = U(\rho,h) =0 \hbox { for } \rho<a \hbox{ and } U(a,z) = f(z)

The book claimed k=-\lambda^2 = -ve can only produce trivial solution of R. I cannot verify this.

k=-ve give \rho^2 R''+ \rho R' +\lambda^2 R=0

This is parametric Bessel's equation of order zero which give R(\rho)=c_1 J_0(\lambda_n\rho) + c_2 Y_0(\lambda_n\rho)

R(0) is bounded \Rightarrow c_2 = 0 \Rightarrow R(\rho)= c_1 J_0(\lambda_n\rho)

That's where I get stuck. I cannot rule this out R(\rho)= c_1 J_0(\lambda_n\rho) as a solution with the given boundary condition.

The book claimed only k=+ve would give solution. Please give me some suggestion.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It is the Z boundary value problem which restricts the values of k. Your Z bvp is:

Z'' + k Z = 0
Z(0) = Z(h) = 0

If you solve this you will find that only k = μ2 > 0 gives non-trivial solutions. So these are the values that must be used in the other equation too.
 
LCKurtz said:
It is the Z boundary value problem which restricts the values of k. Your Z bvp is:

Z'' + k Z = 0
Z(0) = Z(h) = 0

If you solve this you will find that only k = μ2 > 0 gives non-trivial solutions. So these are the values that must be used in the other equation too.

I am embarrassed! Thank you very much.

One more verification. Z''+kZ=0 \Rightarrow Z=d_1cos(\sqrt{k} z) + d_2 sin (\sqrt{k} z)

for k=0 \Rightarrow Z=d_1.\;\;U(\rho,0)=0 \Rightarrow d_1=0 \
I don't know why I cannot edit the d_2 portion.


Therefore k=0 give trivial solution also. Am I correct?

Thanks a million
Alan
 
Last edited:
When k = 0 the solution to the equation does not have a {sine,cosine} form. It is just:

Z'' = 0.

Apply the boundary conditions to the general solution of that and see what happens.
 
Thanks
 
Thread 'Direction Fields and Isoclines'
I sketched the isoclines for $$ m=-1,0,1,2 $$. Since both $$ \frac{dy}{dx} $$ and $$ D_{y} \frac{dy}{dx} $$ are continuous on the square region R defined by $$ -4\leq x \leq 4, -4 \leq y \leq 4 $$ the existence and uniqueness theorem guarantees that if we pick a point in the interior that lies on an isocline there will be a unique differentiable function (solution) passing through that point. I understand that a solution exists but I unsure how to actually sketch it. For example, consider a...
Back
Top