Question on First Law of Thermodynamics (Paramagnet)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of the First Law of Thermodynamics to paramagnetic substances, specifically the differential form dU = δQ + BdM. The participants clarify the relationship between generalized force and displacement, noting that B corresponds to pressure (P) and M corresponds to volume (V). They emphasize that the equation of state for a paramagnetic system cannot be derived simply by substituting P and V from the ideal gas law, and suggest that Curie's law should be considered for the paramagnetic substance in question.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the First Law of Thermodynamics
  • Familiarity with differential forms in thermodynamics
  • Knowledge of Curie's law for paramagnetic substances
  • Basic principles of thermodynamic equations of state
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Curie's law on paramagnetic materials
  • Explore the derivation of equations of state for non-ideal gases
  • Learn about the role of generalized forces in thermodynamic systems
  • Investigate the relationship between magnetic properties and thermodynamic variables
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those specializing in thermodynamics and magnetism, as well as researchers studying the properties of paramagnetic materials.

warhammer
Messages
164
Reaction score
33
Homework Statement
For a pure Paramagnetic substance write down the differential form of first law of thermodynamics and show that C(B)-C(M)=kB^2/T^2

where C(B)=delta (Q)/delta(T) at B constant while C(M)=delta (Q)/delta (T) at M constant.
Relevant Equations
dU= delta (Q) + PdV
For the first part, I have expressed it in the following differential form- dU= delta (Q) + BdM

Now for the second part I am having major confusion. I know that B corresponds to P and M corresponds to V as generalised force and generalised displacement respectively for a Paramagnetic substance.

However I am unsure how to use the differential form as well as the possible equation M=nRT/B (from PV=nRT) in order to obtain the asked relationship. Would be indebted if someone would guide me or highlight my errors above, if any.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
warhammer said:
Relevant Equations:: dU= delta (Q) + PdV
This should be ##dU = \delta Q - PdV##

warhammer said:
For the first part, I have expressed it in the following differential form- dU= delta (Q) + BdM
OK. Note the change in sign where ##+BdM## corresponds to ##-PdV##

warhammer said:
Now for the second part I am having major confusion. I know that B corresponds to P and M corresponds to V as generalised force and generalised displacement respectively for a Paramagnetic substance.
Due to the sign change, if ##B## corresponds to ##P##, shouldn't ##M## correspond to ##-V##?

warhammer said:
However I am unsure how to use the differential form as well as the possible equation M=nRT/B (from PV=nRT) in order to obtain the asked relationship. Would be indebted if someone would guide me or highlight my errors above, if any.
The correspondence ##B \leftrightarrow P## and ##M \leftrightarrow -V## in the first law does not mean that you can obtain the equation of state for the magnetic system by just changing ##P## and ##V## in the equation of state of an ideal gas(!). The equation of state of your system will be an equation that relates ##M, B## and ##T## for your particular substance. You would not expect the equation of state for a paramagnetic substance to be similar in form to the equation of state of an ideal gas. I suspect that you are supposed to assume that your paramagnetic substance obeys Curie's law.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K