Calculating Logarithms Before Calculators: History & Methods

  • Thread starter Thread starter assuredlonewo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithms
AI Thread Summary
Logarithms were calculated before calculators using iterative methods and Taylor series expansions. An iterative approach involves selecting two points, y and z, such that ay < b and az > b, then finding the midpoint w and adjusting based on whether aw is less than or greater than b. Historical methods included using logarithm tables, which were generated through techniques like those developed by John Napier and Henry Briggs, who computed logarithms by taking roots and publishing extensive tables. Slide rules were common tools for engineers, but they required knowledge of logarithmic values for accurate calculations. Overall, manual calculations relied heavily on approximation techniques and pre-computed logarithmic tables.
assuredlonewo
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
How were logarithms calculated before the use of calculators.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Here's an iterative method to approximate it. For instance:

Assume you want to calculate logab, where a and b are positive numbers. So you want to find x such that ax = b. From visual inspection, pick a point y so that you're sure that ay < b and a point z so that az > b.

Now consider w = (y+z)/2 (which is the midpoint between y and z). One of three things will happen:

1) aw < b

2) aw > b

3) aw = b

If aw < b, take the midpoint between w and z and repeat. If aw > b, take the midpoint between w and y and repeat. If aw = b, then you're done(though this will probably not happen).

Keep repeating until you're within a certain epsilon of b.

_____

You can also look at the taylor series expansion around a certain point and cut it off past a certain point. This might be more work though.
 
assuredlonewo said:
How were logarithms calculated before the use of calculators.

Before electronic pocket calculators became common, every engineering student owned one of these ...
powerlog.jpg


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slide_rule
 
Yes, but you needed to know the value of the logarithms in order to make a slide rule.

I can't speak for what was done historically, but you could use the Taylor's series for the logarithm:
ln(x)= \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{(-1)^{n-1}}{n}(x- 1)^n

Ahh!
On "Math Forum- Ask Dr. Math"
http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/52469.html
they have
Instead of taking powers of a number close to 1, as had
Napier, Briggs began with log(10) = 1 and then found other logarithms
by taking successive roots. By finding sqrt(10) = 3.162277 for
example, Briggs had log(3.162277) = 0.500000, and from 10^(3/4) =
sqrt(31.62277) = 5.623413 he had log(5.623413) = 0.7500000.
Continuing in this manner, he computed other common logarithms.
Briggs published his tables of logarithms of numbers from 1 to 1000,
each carried out to 14 places of decimals, in 1617.
 
If you needed more then the 3 digit accuracy of a slide rule you opened a book of log tables. We were even taught to do a linear interpolation to get values between tabulated values.

Halls post is the answer to how did they generate the tables.
 
Oh, dear! You are showing your age!

Yes that's how we did it in the years "B.C.".


(Before Calculators)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
13K
Back
Top