Question on lorentz transformation equations

demonelite123
Messages
216
Reaction score
0
i am reading Lillian R. Lieber's book on the einstein theory of relativity and i am a bit confused on page 65. she wants to take the equations:
x=x'cosθ - y'sinθ
y=x'sinθ + y'cosθ

and compare them to:
x'=β(x-vt)
t'=β(t-vx/c2)

she takes c as one so:
x'=β(x-vt)
t'=β(t-vx)

she solves for x and t and gets:
x=β(x'+vt')
t=β(t'+vx')

then she replaces t with iτ and t' with iτ' and she gets:
x=β(x'+vt')
iτ = iβτ' + βvx'

x=β(x'+vt')
τ=βτ' + iβvx'

next is the part i am confused about. she sets β = cosθ and -iβv = sinθ. this nicely turns the Lorentz equations into:
x=x'cosθ - τ'sinθ
τ=x'sinθ + τ'cosθ

what i don't understand is how did she choose -iβv = sinθ? it works out all nicely in the end but how did she know that sinθ had to equal -iβv? was it arbitrary as a result of trial and error or did she use β = cosθ in order to figure out that -iβv = sinθ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
demonelite123 said:
next is the part i am confused about. she sets β = cosθ and -iβv = sinθ. this nicely turns the Lorentz equations into:
x=x'cosθ - τ'sinθ
τ=x'sinθ + τ'cosθ

what i don't understand is how did she choose -iβv = sinθ? it works out all nicely in the end but how did she know that sinθ had to equal -iβv? was it arbitrary as a result of trial and error or did she use β = cosθ in order to figure out that -iβv = sinθ?

This can't be, are you sure that the author is not setting:

\beta=cosh(\theta) and \beta v= sinh (\theta). Note the use of hyperbolic trigonometry as in https://www.physicsforums.com/blog.php?b=1911
 
Last edited by a moderator:
starthaus said:
This can't be, are you sure that the author is not setting:

\beta=cosh(\theta) and \beta v= sinh (\theta). Note the use of hyperbolic trigonometry as in https://www.physicsforums.com/blog.php?b=1911

But you can use the substitutions sinh x = -isin ix and cosh x = cos ix.

Anyway the answer to demonelite, thoguh I haven't been looked at myself, is that your question should be answered by considering what θ is.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Back
Top