Question on MOS strong inversion

  • Thread starter Thread starter htzzz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inversion
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of strong inversion in MOSFETs, specifically addressing the behavior of gate voltage (Vg) in relation to threshold voltage (Vth). When Vg significantly exceeds Vth, the surface potential remains relatively constant while the depletion width (xdmax) stabilizes, leading to an increase in inversion charge rather than further depletion. The maximum depletion width is defined by the equation X_{dmax} = √(K_sε_0k_BT/q²N_A log(N_A/n_i). This indicates that the assumption of bulk charge dominance over inversion charge (Qb >> Qinv) becomes invalid post-inversion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of MOSFET operation principles
  • Familiarity with semiconductor physics, particularly depletion regions
  • Knowledge of threshold voltage concepts in MOSFETs
  • Proficiency in using equations related to semiconductor charge and potential
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of threshold voltage in MOSFETs
  • Learn about the relationship between surface potential and inversion charge
  • Explore the impact of gate oxide thickness on MOSFET performance
  • Investigate methods for quantifying inversion charge in strong inversion scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, semiconductor physicists, and students studying MOSFET technology will benefit from this discussion, particularly those focusing on device operation and performance optimization in strong inversion conditions.

htzzz
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am a bit confused about the MOS strong inversion case.
When Vg>>Vth, is the equation describing gate voltage at threshold still applicable? If not, what is the expression for corresponding surface potential and depletion width. Some books suggest that surface potential and depletion width won't change much, please explain why. If it's not easy to explain by posting, could anyone please send me a link or reference? Thank you!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
As you increase the charge on the gate, this charge needs to be compensated by charge in the semiconductor. At first, the charge is compensated by an increasing depletion region, which "uncovers" fixed charge in the semiconductor. However, as the gate voltage increases, you reach a point where it is energetically more favorable for charge on the gate to be compensated by inversion charge at the surface instead of further depletion. This is the threshold voltage. At this point the depletion region stops growing (this depletion region width is usually called xdmax), and the inversion charge starts increasing. The surface potential doesn't change much beyond this because the inversion charge is an exponential function of the surface potential, so it only takes a small change in the surface potential to get a large change in the inversion charge.

The maximum depletion width (xdmax) for a uniformly doped semiconductor is given by the relation:
[tex]X_{dmax}=\sqrt{\frac{K_s\epsilon_0 k_B T}{q^2N_A} log(\frac{N_A}{n_i})}[/tex]
 
Thank you phyzguy!

So it means as the gate voltage increases, the voltage across the oxide will increase while the surface potential is constant?

And the assumption that semiconductor bulk charge is much greater than inversion charge (Qb >> Qinv) which was used in deriving the threshold voltage is no longer valid after inversion?

And is there a way to quantify the inversion charge besides using Qg - Qb = Qinv in strong inversion?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
14K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K