What is a good Overdrive Factor for a BJT?

  • Thread starter Thread starter saad87
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bjt
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around selecting an appropriate BJT for use as a buffer in a circuit, focusing on overdrive factors, saturation conditions, and component specifications. Participants explore the implications of input resistance, collector current ratings, and the need for external resistors in the context of digital circuit design.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculates the overdrive factor for the PIMN31 BJT and questions if an overdrive factor of approximately 2 is sufficient, noting that recommendations suggest a factor of 10.
  • Another participant challenges the assumption of a constant beta value in saturation, suggesting that a beta of 20 may be more realistic and recommends driving the base current higher than initially calculated.
  • A participant expresses concern about the input resistance and recalculates the base current, concluding that the transistor may not be in saturation.
  • Suggestions are made to consider using a Darlington pair, although one participant reports issues with the collector-emitter voltage being too high for their application.
  • There is a discussion about the appropriateness of using a maximum collector current rating of 100mA versus 200mA for a collector current requirement of 70mA, with a preference expressed for the higher rating to ensure reliability.
  • Links to component resources are provided for further exploration of suitable transistors.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the sufficiency of the overdrive factor or the appropriate maximum collector current rating. Multiple competing views on the calculations and component selection remain present throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the assumptions made in calculations, particularly concerning the beta value in saturation and the impact of input resistance on base current. The discussion highlights the need for careful consideration of component specifications in digital circuit applications.

saad87
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
I've been looking some pre-biased dual NPNs to use as buffers. My criteria is to have a very small package (i would prefer their width be less than 3mm. 2mm is very good) and that they ought to have a max. collector current rating of 200mA.

I may have found such an NPN in the http://www.nxp.com/documents/data_sheet/PIMN31.pdf" but I fear I may not be overdriving it enough. I'll first describe how I'm calculating if the BJT reaches saturation. The max. collector-emitter voltage at saturation for the PIMN31 is 0.3V. Hence, load current is:

My collector current is:
\frac{Vcc - Vce}{47}=\frac{3.3 - 0.3}{47}=63mA

The min. Hfe for the PIMN31 is 70. Therefore, required Ib:

\frac{Ic}{β}=\frac{63}{70}=0.9mA

The PIMN31 has two biasing resistors. R1 is the input resistor connected to the base and R2 is connected between the base and emitter. I convert this to a thevien equivalent circuit:

Vth = \frac{R2}{R1 + R2} * Vin =\frac{11K}{11K+1.3K}*3=2.68V
Rth = R1||R2=\frac{11K*1.3K}{11K + 1.3K}=1.16K

Therefore, actual base current:

\frac{Vth-Vbe}{Rin}=\frac{2.68-0.6}{1.16K}=1.78mA

Now, if my calculations are correct (are they?), the transistor is saturating. But...

Overdrive Factor: 1.78/0.9 = 1.97 ~ 2.

Is this enough? I have read online online that a overdrive factor of 10 is recommended. The issue is, I can't find a transistor with a small enough input resistance and a high enough current rating. If I do, they aren't in a small enough package.

My other option is a http://www.fairchildsemi.com/ds/FD%2FFDG6317NZ.pdf" . I have found one in a very small package, but the trouble is I will need external resistors for the gate and a pull down resistance between gate and source.

It's not that I'm hesitant to include these resistances, it's just I need 300 of these buffers on the board. If 2 per transistor are required, that's 600 on the board. Of course, this begs the question: are these resistances really needed?

Some of you will inevitably be wondering what the application is. Please see https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=548271" where I provide quite a bit of information.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
First you cannot count on \beta=70 when you drive into saturation. If you look at page 4, if you want 0.3 volt Vsat, you need 2.5mA to get collector current of 50mA. That means \beta=20. For 63mA requirement, you better drive at least 3mA. I would drive 5mA.

First of all, it is not correct to use Thev. calculation. The base emitter diode turn on at 0.7V and essentially prevent the R2 from working. The more important thing, this is digital circuit, don't worry about Thev. stuff. R2 is 10 times R1, Just treat R2 not there. R1 is 1.3K max, so, drive the input of V=IR=5mAX1.3K=6.5V and you'll ok. The spec in page 2 give +12V is the limiting value to drive the input, so you are way within the safety range.

If you can only drive 5V, you still drive almost 4mA, so that should be good enough.

Learn to simplify calculation if possible, look for component that dominate the effect and simplify by ignore the part that is not that important. In your case, you are not doing analog, R2 is 10 times value of R1. Just look for the upper limit and overdrive the device. This is the practical way of design circuits even in analog. I always try to design with one dominant component and ignore the others. I can tell you in my almost 30 years design analog circuits, I can count on using network theorems with two hands! Just like opamp or closed loop control system, if you can get away with dominant pole compensation, don't add in other poles and zeros! You'll be surprise how much you can get away with simple assumption.
 
Last edited:
Thanks yungman, your point about simplfying the calculation made sense and I'll follow that.

However, because now the input resistance is essentially 1.3K and my input voltage is 3.3V (I cannot increase this), my base current is just 2.5mA. Since beta = 20, then my required current is 3.1mA.

I think I will need a different transistor as this is not in saturation.
 
Yes, it should be very easy to find a transistor. Look at a darlington also.
 
yungman, I actually tried a darlington array before. The issue was that the collector-emitter voltage was 0.6V. This is not low-enough - the collector of the darlington is connected to a Max V CPLD. The max. voltage at which the CPLD is guaranteed to read a low is 0.8V. I felt that 0.6V was quite close to 0.8V and did not feel comfortable with that decision. Hence, my search for a suitable BJT or MOSFET.

With MOSFET, I'll need external resistors. With BJTs, the trick is to find a small enough package. Two BJTs in one package would be ideal really but a small enough package housing a single transistor is good enough as well.

But before I search again, I want to ask, for a collector current of 70mA is a Absolute Max. Rating of Ic 100mA ok or should it at least be 200mA? I feel 200mA is better or can the design be ok with 100mA? With 100mA, a lot of options open up.
 
saad87 said:
yungman, I actually tried a darlington array before. The issue was that the collector-emitter voltage was 0.6V. This is not low-enough - the collector of the darlington is connected to a Max V CPLD. The max. voltage at which the CPLD is guaranteed to read a low is 0.8V. I felt that 0.6V was quite close to 0.8V and did not feel comfortable with that decision. Hence, my search for a suitable BJT or MOSFET.

With MOSFET, I'll need external resistors. With BJTs, the trick is to find a small enough package. Two BJTs in one package would be ideal really but a small enough package housing a single transistor is good enough as well.

But before I search again, I want to ask, for a collector current of 70mA is a Absolute Max. Rating of Ic 100mA ok or should it at least be 200mA? I feel 200mA is better or can the design be ok with 100mA? With 100mA, a lot of options open up.

I provide you with the link to DigiKey so you can look around to find one. You can get 150mA or 200mA easily.

http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll

http://search.digikey.com/us/en/products/2PC4081S,115/568-5989-1-ND/2531276

http://www.nxp.com/documents/data_sheet/2PC4081.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
11K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
68
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K