Question on Red shift applied to objects within the same galaxy

AI Thread Summary
Redshift can be applied to stars within the same galaxy to determine their motion relative to Earth, similar to its use for distant galaxies. However, the factors influencing redshift differ; while galaxies generally move apart due to cosmic expansion, stars within a galaxy are affected by their orbital dynamics around the galactic core. Stars do not maintain a constant redshift over time, as they are constantly interacting and moving relative to one another, leading to varying velocities. Their orbits are not circular and can change, resulting in complex trajectories. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurately depicting stellar movement in cosmological contexts.
TheDarkFrontie
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I signed up just to ask you guys a quick question, as most of you will know infinitely more than I do on this subject. I'm not an astrophysicist, I have a strong interest in the universe and cosmology, but it's more of a hobby for me than a central focus, so I apologise in advance if this seems very elementary and obvious. Anyway, I just wanted to clear something up for a science fiction story I'm currently planning.

I know red shift is used to calculate the speed at which different galaxies are moving away from our own - but does that also apply to stellar objects within the same galaxy? I know that stellar bodies within the same galaxy all orbit a central point at the galactic core, but does that hold everything in place? For example - would a star say, 5,000 light years from Earth have the same red shift now as thousands of years ago?

Again, apologies if this seems very basic and obvious, but I thought it best to get clarification on this.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The blue/red shift of an object will tell you how fast it is moving toward or away from us, even inside our own galaxy. Hubble's law does not apply for objects so close, and the motion of objects within our galaxy depends on the details of their orbital motion in the potential of the galaxy, as you said. This orbital motion does not "hold everything together", so the galaxy does not rotate as a rigid body, for two reasons. First, objects closer to the center are orbiting faster, so even if all of the orbits were circular, stars would shift relative to each other over time. Second, the orbits are generally not circular. So if you plotted the trajectories of all of the stars, it would look like a big tangled plate of spaghetti. Even the orbit of a single star does not close on itself, so it does not follow the same path on successive orbits.
 
TheDarkFrontie said:
I know red shift is used to calculate the speed at which different galaxies are moving away from our own - but does that also apply to stellar objects within the same galaxy?

Yes. The redshift can be measured and used to figure out the motion away from or towards ourselves. Remember that redshift works the same for both galaxies moving away from us and for stars and other objects moving away from us as well. It is only the cause that is different.

I know that stellar bodies within the same galaxy all orbit a central point at the galactic core, but does that hold everything in place? For example - would a star say, 5,000 light years from Earth have the same red shift now as thousands of years ago?

No, stars are constantly passing and being passed, interacting with each other and everything else. They even oscillate up and down through the spiral arm they occupy, leading to a motion in the z axis as well. It's a big mess out there!
 
Thank you for your responses, it has been very helpful to me!
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top